To denigrate all class d amplifiers like the OP shows utter shallow thought and serious bias. To the OP: there are myriad different amplifier designs that fall under class d. So the class d categorization is so generic as to me virtually meaningless.
Do yourself a favor and listen to different amplifiers without foreknowledge of what class or design they are. Stop letting your preconceived notions about how a particular amplifier should sound based on its design dictate your preferences.
Anyone who believes that a well designed, built and sufficiently powered amplifier from 20-30 years ago automatically sounds inferior to a modern one is deluding himself. Any differences between quality amplifiers regardless of class are infinitesimal compared to the influences of the room acoustics, the loudspeaker and ones hearing on this particular day.
I am an ex classical musician and my sound reference is decades of live acoustic music. To my ears, my (ancient) W4S STP-SE and ST1000 driving my Walsh 5000s sound wonderful and have done so for 10 years. If the ST1000s are slightly better that my Sumo, Rotel and B&k amps it is primarily because they have greater dynamic power and much much lower noise. The fact is these are all excellent amplifiers. Modern designs seeking to reduce distortion and phase errors from inaudible to more inaudible are not going to sound objectivity better. It is better to focus on efficiency and reliability which class d addresses directly. You are best served by focusing resources on room treatments, placement and choosing loudspeakers that have less reactive demanding loads and superior drivers and materials.
Do yourself a favor and listen to different amplifiers without foreknowledge of what class or design they are. Stop letting your preconceived notions about how a particular amplifier should sound based on its design dictate your preferences.
Anyone who believes that a well designed, built and sufficiently powered amplifier from 20-30 years ago automatically sounds inferior to a modern one is deluding himself. Any differences between quality amplifiers regardless of class are infinitesimal compared to the influences of the room acoustics, the loudspeaker and ones hearing on this particular day.
I am an ex classical musician and my sound reference is decades of live acoustic music. To my ears, my (ancient) W4S STP-SE and ST1000 driving my Walsh 5000s sound wonderful and have done so for 10 years. If the ST1000s are slightly better that my Sumo, Rotel and B&k amps it is primarily because they have greater dynamic power and much much lower noise. The fact is these are all excellent amplifiers. Modern designs seeking to reduce distortion and phase errors from inaudible to more inaudible are not going to sound objectivity better. It is better to focus on efficiency and reliability which class d addresses directly. You are best served by focusing resources on room treatments, placement and choosing loudspeakers that have less reactive demanding loads and superior drivers and materials.