Your reaction resemble a child reaction when he "proudly" spot an error in the discourse of a grown up...
Uhmm OK, so read further in that asinine post by @artemus_5:
"Why is the vaccine mandated or lose your job?"
Why have vaccines always been mandated for children if they want go to school? Same reason. They don't call it PUBLIC HEALTH just for giggles, you know?
"Why do you still need a mask IF the vaccine works?"
Because vaccines are NEVER, EVER 100% effective, and you can be transmissive anytime you are infected, whether you are symptomatic or not. Exactly as with Influenza, measles, etc. etc. As pointed out ad nauseum by every expert everywhere, while ignored in the fever swamps of the internet.
"Why is ivermectin, hydrochloroguine et al not allowed to be used despite its efficacy rate?"
There is no established "efficacy rate" for either of these. Just anecdotal nonsense. YOU tell ME why anti-parisitcal medications *would* be efficacious against a VIRUS? All real studies have shown hydroxchloroquine to be ineffective. Both have side effects as well. Yes, vaccines have side effects, but they are also efficacious.
"Why is the vaccine mandated even on those who have had Covid and have better immunity than the vaccine gives?"
Evidence is now clear that in fact, "natural" antibody response is not as effective as the mRNA vaccines. And no one knows the length of antibody activity at this time.
So, @mahgister6, you tell me whether, in light of the baseless nonsense in the rest of his post, I should assume he a) obviously knew what he was talking about, but made a simple ommission, or b) he's clueless about biology and vaccines? If you choose a) then I submit you are hopeless. And, it's not my job to pick out the rare omission out of a trough of swill.
Sorry, but we "children" are wont to read and react to the tone and content of the entire post/response, instead of instead of working ourselves up into a slathering froth on perusing merely the response lede.
