Macdad,
I would quibble with your analysis as I think $3,000 would be way cheap if dealer cost is $2600. Even $3500 would be a fine price and less profit than I expect they would need to keep the lights on. Still, I don't disagree with the "price fixing" issue in that I think if a store has paid the dealer cost, then they ought to be able to discount as they see fit. There are problems with this too as if they allow mail order then one high volume dealer will drive all the local shops out. Still, one commonly sees both price fixing and territory enforcement. Why both? Seems like one or the other ought to be sufficient and would allow for more flexibility of marketing strategy by the individual stores in their region if they were allowed to discount.
I would quibble with your analysis as I think $3,000 would be way cheap if dealer cost is $2600. Even $3500 would be a fine price and less profit than I expect they would need to keep the lights on. Still, I don't disagree with the "price fixing" issue in that I think if a store has paid the dealer cost, then they ought to be able to discount as they see fit. There are problems with this too as if they allow mail order then one high volume dealer will drive all the local shops out. Still, one commonly sees both price fixing and territory enforcement. Why both? Seems like one or the other ought to be sufficient and would allow for more flexibility of marketing strategy by the individual stores in their region if they were allowed to discount.