Monoblocks or Bi-Amp


Hey guys,
I'm doing some planning for my future upgrades. I have recently moved to Tubes from SS and was wondering if I should get some Monoblocks or bi-amp my speakers. I was considering the Rogue M-120's or the Rogue Tempest with an extra Rogue Power amp. Or even a SS powerhouse for the bass modules and the tube integrated for the mid and highs.

What have you guys tried and what was the best combination?

System:
Cliffhanger Audio CHS-2 W2 (88db, 4ohms)
Rogue Magnum Tempest 60W Tube Integrated amp
EAD Ultradisk 2000
Virtual Dynamics Ref. Shotgun Speaker cables and Interconnects.
buckingham
I second Ezmeralda's biamping option. Versatility is an added advantage: you can choose the sound for the mid/his vs the bass... On the down side, electronic c-over is the best option in my experience & it's not always easy to "match" different amps. I.e., you'll have to listen to them, which poses a home audition availability problem.
Hey guys, I've decided to stick with the integrated for a while and move up to the monoblocks and preamp in a few months when this term is done.... Probably after exams are over. Thanks for all your help, very knowledgeable Ezmeralda11, great info.
There is 1 advantage of Mono blocks.Short runs of speaker cables.This is a plus.With the Tempest adding a 88 is a very nice option.
Speaker cables draw power & the longer they are the more power they draw from your amp. Larry w.