soundstage


interested to know which component has the most effect on getting good soundstage..especially back to front.Also can someone enlighten me as to how speaker placement effects soundstage. I have altec horns. I get good side to side soundstage but very little front back. All opinions are most welcome. Thanks, Larry
lvk47
From my experience with a 300B SET amp and Klipsch La Scala horns, NOS tubes made a big difference with the soundstage. But nothing has made a bigger difference, particularly with the depth (front to back) of the soundstage, than putting a Michael Wolff carbon PC on my CD player. I know I'm going to start sounding like his pet monkey, but I cannot say enough about the immense difference this cord has had in expanding the sound, and making everything come off as being played live.

And as Warren said, bring out the speakers into the room, if possible. The music will fill in the space behind them.

Good luck!
Howard
Speaker placement (within your room, of course). That's where the "soundstageing comes from. It also comes from the recording & mastering -- but you can't do anything about that!

Try placing yr speakers further into the room and asymmetrically to the side walls -- i.e. at an angle to their back wall.
I have a bunch of speakers, I'd have to say you're not going to get a whole lot of spacial revelation with a big horn loaded speaker anyway.. I don't with mine. Plus I have to be listening absolutely on-axis down the throats of the horns for the best treble.
I may get disagreement here, but this is my view on soundstage. Side to side soundstage is enhanced by fewer drivers or more of a point source (i.e. old Tannoy speakers.) They can still be excellent provided that the drivers are in a single vertical line for each channel, although I think you get a bit of smear from the room because it will reflect back from more than a point source. We are basically looking at recreating the point source of microphones, correct?

Front to back soundstage is enhanced by dynamics, partly by how much louder the close material is compared to the rear instruments. You tend to hear less detail in the further instruments. But the main character of depth is the result of transients that recreate a 'space'. Close instruments are heard more directly with reflections taking a back seat, whereas farther instruments have reflected sound competing more with the direct signal recorded.

I think any part of the system that can reproduce these transients more clearly, will help resolve the front to back soundstage. The room can, of course, interfere. In fact, I often find that havings the speakers a few feet from the back wall creates more front to back.

Perhaps everyone here will have a different perspective as to which part of the reproduction chain will make the most difference. I say whatever the weak link in the system, that's what will provide the most improvement.