Its the rah rah mentality and attempts to silence dissenters that I disapprove of. Especially since the most trusted technical people on this site are at a loss to explain what people hear.
That does not discount what people hear. It just means that the book is still open in terms of understanding things.
Directionality is another issue.
So rah rah is fine by those who have realized value but it is clearly not a lock that others will. Especially if a long burn in is truly required and return period is 30 days. That’s a losing combination for sure that many could face. i think it was a skeptic who pointed that out earlier.
Shunning dissenters is a sure way to skew the results that others might look to for guidance.