Difference between micro line and gyger s stylus


I see that Benz has switched from a micro line stylus tip to the gyger s stylus tip. What differences both in sound and set up should a person expect? Pro's and Con's on both are welcome.

Also, would one style work better or worse on my Naim ARO unipivot tonearm mounted on LP12?

Thank you,
Don
no_regrets
Too bad shure doesn't make the V15Vxmr anymore. I can't believe they stopped production on it. Probably the best moving magnet cartridge value out there. What I may do is buy a M97XE which is priced under $100. It uses an elliptical stylus. I'll experiment and see if it shreds styrene. If it doesn't, I may just purchase an extra arm wand for the JMW-9 and use the Shure just for 45's when needed. I'll keep the dynavector 20XL for LP use.

A_L

Happy us J.Carr is still among us. What a relief! . I want to explain the following. The so called ''Gyger styli'' are designed by Van den Hul for Gyger. The Gyger 1 was difficult to produce but so was the Gyger 2 so he than designed the ''S''. Van den Hul never produced his own styli but made an arangement with Gyger such that he was

entitled to sell Gyger under his own (trade) name. But he deed not

mark them as 1,2, or S but used the ''general reference'' Van den Hul. That is to say without distinction between 1, 2 and S.

BTW Lukatschek from Benz moved from ''Gyger S'' to micro-ridge

not the other way round. To my knowledge Jan Allaerts is still

using the ''S''.