Ralph, you have been probably the most consistently knowledgeable, helpful poster here (the whole forum) for the past decade or more (despite your biases - many of which I share).
The post above is very interesting. Something along those lines definitely jives with my experience with digital music - there is something unnatural about it that no amount of expense or technology can seem to completely eradicate.
With really good digital you won't notice it right away, which is one reason rooms with digital sources can win "Best of Show" awards, but it is always there in the end.
This includes digital recordings of vinyl made at high PCM resolutions and sample rates or DSD128 and studio-quality equipment. You may think it sounds indistinguishable at first (I did), but eventually, once you are trained, you can hear, immediately, what it is that never fails to get to you over time.
The experience points to information uncorrelated with the input signal, as you say.
The post above is very interesting. Something along those lines definitely jives with my experience with digital music - there is something unnatural about it that no amount of expense or technology can seem to completely eradicate.
With really good digital you won't notice it right away, which is one reason rooms with digital sources can win "Best of Show" awards, but it is always there in the end.
This includes digital recordings of vinyl made at high PCM resolutions and sample rates or DSD128 and studio-quality equipment. You may think it sounds indistinguishable at first (I did), but eventually, once you are trained, you can hear, immediately, what it is that never fails to get to you over time.
The experience points to information uncorrelated with the input signal, as you say.