Audioquest WEL vs Wild Blue

The WEL interconnect has a much blacker background, a lot more body and the bass is way more punchier than what you hear with the WBY. It also has better dynamic capabilities and amazing textures being tonally richer... The WBY is a tad thinner and airier while the WEL sounds just rock solidly dense, textured and large. The WBY is one hell of a cable but if you can stretch more, go for the WEL.

I agree with your assessment 100%, johndoe21ro. I now have 1M pairs of balanced WEL and WBY. Your description is on point. The WEL does give dence, full, Rich images. Where the WBY is lighter. The only time I might consider WBY a better choice would be with really dark sounding components. In my system, I LOVE WEL. I use WBY only as a back-up. I also agree with the previous comment by folkfreak. I think Audioquest interconnects are better than Audioquest speaker cables. I've chosen Synergistic Research Galileo LE in my system.

Transparent. Great. Can't afford it.

I own both Wel and Wild interconnects in my system. They are both exceptional good in diversity in height. Silver is a lot more precise than copper it creates a shaper and more realistsic individual focus of both voices and instruments. Also they are faster in response and reveal more details in the high freq. compared to copper ones.

The differences between the Wel and Wild are big. The Wel has a lot more drive and control in the low freq. But also it has a lot more grip and Authority than the Wild has. The differences in price are also rather big.

The Wild and Wel powercables I tested also a few tiems but they were not acceptable in my world. The newAQ  powercables are superior to the Wel and Wild powercables.

I like Audioquest a lot.....but when I plugged in WEL, it was surely a step backward....just wasn't right.   I encourage all to see how it (all cables) work with their own system.