I don’t have a problem with the text regarding Ohm Walsh. I have a problem with this self contradictory line:
Pistonically means the cone acts like a rigid piston. You can’t be pistonic and bending wave at the same time, but you can be pistonic for some frequencies and bending wave at others.
Walsh style drivers are essentially specially designed cones that operate pistonically just like traditional dynamic drivers.
Pistonically means the cone acts like a rigid piston. You can’t be pistonic and bending wave at the same time, but you can be pistonic for some frequencies and bending wave at others.