Upgrading sub to get a live feel.


I currently have a set of JBL 4319 which has its history as 4310. They are studio monitors and as a result they sound like studio monitors you hear everything, but they lack the physical presence on the low end. They have wonderful mid range and voice presence. I also have a pair of SVS SB1000 to help with the low end. 

I want to eventually upgrade to JBL 4367 with upgraded pair of subs, for this reason, but in the mean time would a sub upgrade be considered before the speakers. 


thewatcher101
Have you tried a more asymmetrical positioning with the two extra subs. IOW place a couple behind your speakers along the front wall, then the other two should be place along the side walls, but not symmetrical, stagger them. I have also seen arrangements recommended where the subs are place along the front and back wall. I think someone may have linked to the article in this thread. You also have the challenge of setting the volume level of the subs optimally. There are better experts on this thread than I to advise on that. Keep playing with it though, you will eventually getting it dialed in.
I just checked the OP's posts and he hasn't mentioned the size of the room, unless I missed it, or someone else correctly guessed it in one of the many verbose other posts.  The cubic footage is crucial.  Also, the shape of the room ( L shape??), whether there are arched ceilings, carpeted vs laminate, etc, is all worth considering.

The OP's current speakers retail for $4000, and he's considering replacing them with $14000 speakers.  First of all, I am puzzled why either of his current subs, scraping the bottom of the budget barrel at around $500 each, would be considered a good match for the current speakers, let alone the possible upgrades.

Second, sealed subs generally have a different sound than ported subs, and are considered more musical than the ported designs.  As you go up the budget, ported designs get better, but at the $500 level, too many compromises occur.  And only 300 watts?  Yeah.


You'll think this sounds ridiculous,but it costs nothing to experiment.Turn the subs behind your listening position to face the wall.Clio is right about trying them in various positions.All four of mine are positioned facing the walls.It is a pain to fine tune the positions and crossovers  x 4.I worked on mine for a couple of hours at a time maybe every three days or so to keep myself from getting OCD over it:)
thewatcher101:
The room size is 16x30. The speakers are placed on the 16 side, and I sit about 11 feet away from the speakers. The SB are located right under the main, 6" from the wall.

I'm reading this as your main speakers are 6" from the wall??? Can't be right.

Subs right under, or even real close to the mains is another problem. Some might think this is necessary for timing or whatever. Do a little research. Timing is not a factor with low bass.

Instead what you want is exactly the opposite of timing: a lot of randomly spaced sources. Putting subs close to mains is by duplicating the location robbing you of a lot of the improvement you'd otherwise be getting. Move em.

The SB-1000 are set to about 65Hz to blend, zero phase, 60% volume. I’ve always found very clean and articulate bass at this current settings, and anytime I’ve made an adjustment, I’ve dialed it back to these.
Easily the biggest problem or pitfall with subs is trying to hear them working. When done right you don't hear them at all. No one listening to my system will have any idea there are 5 subs. No one will have any idea there are ANY subs! They certainly will have no idea there are two way back off to either side and behind them. 

My first big mistake in setting these up was getting the levels way too high. Its hard because a lot of recordings have no really low bass to speak of. So its real easy to wind up with too high levels because you used the wrong recording.

Test tones and meters aren't much help either. This is because the way us humans hear really low bass changes depending on volume. See Fletcher-Munson curves. Because of all this what I find works best is just relax, listen to a lot of music at whatever volume levels you like, and don't try and get it dialed in too fast. Be patient, make very small tweaks, and don't try and make any one recording sound perfect.

First test just running one additional sub (3), placed on the left side besides my seat, set at 60Hz, played with gain to peak bass, and 60% volume. The biggest difference is an increased amount of headroom, the speakers felt slightly larger.

Yes. "The biggest difference is an increased amount of headroom, the speakers felt slightly larger." Exactly! 

The bass that comes from adding more subs is completely different than the bass that comes from adding a bigger sub. The difference is exactly what you said, the speakers sound "bigger". 

The thing about really low bass, the frequencies are 40, 80 feet or more in wavelength. Because low bass has such a long wavelength the only places you really hear them are in huge auditoriums or concert halls. Walk into any huge space like that you can tell its a huge space even with your eyes closed. Because of the fundamental low bass resonance. You feel it. It tells you you're enveloped in a vast space.

Now with one or two subs, even really good ones, the low bass reflects and cancels and really cannot truly exist. So you never get this feeling of envelopment. With three or more subs though at some point there are enough extra sources to overcome the cancellations and the really low bass is believably there and you do get this sense of envelopment. This is what is making your speakers sound "bigger".


 It blends well in this position, but you can feel the physical bass being directional. That feeling makes you slightly detract from listening.
Not sure what you're doing. The only time I ever was able to localize a sub the crossover was way too high. Set properly all my bass is incredibly, ubelievably precise and localizable. The bass. Not the speakers. 

Now sometimes the bass on the recording just happens to be coming from where there's a sub. This happened a couple times and bugged me until I realized its not the sub, its the recording. Patience.

Second test, quad sub, placed along side seating position against the wall. Similar settings, but with 45% volume, because the wall gives it a boost. I get a nice spacial balance, but I could not get them to blend in this position. At those settings, I got a bit of harshness in the low regions.
Probably this is just too much bass. Every additional sub adds both extension and headroom- and volume. Adding a sub requires turning down the level on all the subs.



16 x 30 is the room size.

I prefer sealed subs, but the Audiokinesis Swarm was designed as ported, with the option to seal the port with a plug. The set up used by the designer has the woofers facing the wall as jtcf mentioned. When I used a Swarm like set up I had woofers facing into the room and towards the wall. Even had one next to the listening seat and anyone who came over for a listen, including a friend who designs and sells speakers, couldn't hear any of the subs. He had to ask where the 4th sub was located and when I told him to look over the side of the arm rest he chuckled when he spotted the sub.

In my set up now the two front woofers face each other along the front wall, the other two woofers are next to the speakers and face out into the room per a method recommended by mijostyn who has posted on this thread and other sub threads. Both methods work well for me, but given the type of speakers (line array) I am using now the newer method has resulted in increased bass response and more 3D imaging. If I go back to point source speakers I will go back to an asymmetrical arrangement.