@jtcf 761 posts
11-09-2019 10:09pm
That is really interesting.I know that a too short digital cable is troublesome,but ics too?Every little thing really does matter even if it shouldn't.I'll be interested to hear what Rob says.I'm still waiting impatiently to demo other cables.The last piece of the puzzle I think.
It might be more believable if there was a difference in version or connector types or different type internal wire used, but these are the same version cables and visually in every way, just 1.0M vs. 1.5M and slight age/use difference - that's it. My buddy ended up with a 2.0M pair of AP Crystal IC in a used system he purchased at an audio show. I remember the MFG factory guy just saying the liked the longer ICs better in that particular all tube system. While I've read it written many times over the years, many note "use longer ICs" and "shorter speaker cables", perhaps some truth to this with digital source components. It's extra noticeable on more inferior recordings played via high resolution streaming services through my tube DAC. Yes, tried many different tubes in my DAC, different preamp tubes, and nothing rid that upper midrange glare. Then swapping the 1.0M and 1.5M IC placement did at the DAC. Kinda having a hard time wrapping my mind around this one.