What I meant is that you could use the best amp and sub on the market and the LS50 is still not going to get you very far when compared with any number of more expensive speakers. This would include a great number of monitors. Not saying the LS50 is a bad speaker but certainly not a truly high end product.
How does this make sense, any sense? Any sense at all??
I was just looking at Stereophile's recommended components, for speakers.
Within the Class A restricted extreme low frequencies category are:
KEF LS50 at $1500 and
Wilson Sasha at $38,000.
Why would you pay 38 grand when you can get the same category for 1500? Why I say?
Even worse!!!
In the full range Class B category we have the KEF Ref. 5 at $20,000.
Why would you wanna pay $20,000 for a speaker that is outclassed by the same family (KEF LS50) at a fraction of the price?
How does this make any sense????
Stereophile, seriously. Let 'er rip homie.
Within the Class A restricted extreme low frequencies category are:
KEF LS50 at $1500 and
Wilson Sasha at $38,000.
Why would you pay 38 grand when you can get the same category for 1500? Why I say?
Even worse!!!
In the full range Class B category we have the KEF Ref. 5 at $20,000.
Why would you wanna pay $20,000 for a speaker that is outclassed by the same family (KEF LS50) at a fraction of the price?
How does this make any sense????
Stereophile, seriously. Let 'er rip homie.
- ...
- 49 posts total
- 49 posts total