I have a good friend who is an accomplished violinist, she claimed to me more than once, that she'd never heard a playback device that could come close to violin. That could mimic it close enough to fool her into believing it was the real thing.
I have wondered and discussed with a few people, if it were that in the early days of digital they would have suggested a slightly wider range than the "'human auditory range", from say 20Hz to 30Khz, would the harmonics included make a difference? Would it be better with interpolation for example with stringed instruments?
I found the following, it's not verified.
"For example, when recording 44.1 kHz audio, you are capturing frequencies up to the 22 kHz range. When sampling at 48 kHz, you are really capturing frequencies up to 24 kHz."
I have wondered and discussed with a few people, if it were that in the early days of digital they would have suggested a slightly wider range than the "'human auditory range", from say 20Hz to 30Khz, would the harmonics included make a difference? Would it be better with interpolation for example with stringed instruments?
I found the following, it's not verified.
As for the frequency spectrum active as a result of the violin’s sound:
Bowed open G string: ~191 hz to ~16000 hz
Bowed open E string: ~658 hz to ~17000 hz
Plucked open G: ~191 hz to ~8000–12000 hz (depending on how much ‘click’ you want)
Plucked open E: ~191 hz to ~17000 hz
"For example, when recording 44.1 kHz audio, you are capturing frequencies up to the 22 kHz range. When sampling at 48 kHz, you are really capturing frequencies up to 24 kHz."
"While some people claim that they notice a slight improvement in audio quality when selecting the higher audio rate, research indicates that 20 kHz is the limit to human hearing."
Source- https://www.protoolsproduction.com/44-1khz-vs-48khz-audio-which-is-better/