Can an “audiophile” ever be satisfied with a system?


After I finally found a great used Woodsong Garrard 301, I was inspired to upgrade my entire system.
After 49 years of building up, am I finally off the merry-go-round??
Or are the improvements never-ending??
Now coming a new Triplanar tonearm, SRA platform for the 301 and Stillpoints for the preamp.
What’s left? New cartridge? New TV? Think the clearly endless quest is buying LPs!
Hope I am satisfied. Got a lot of great deals on new and used stuff but adding it all up puts me up to over $100K!
mglik
My system is "good enough" to listen to piano and symphonic mass....

In the last years i put all energy in my listenings experiments to improve the system.... Now i listen to music without making listenings experiments most of the times...

Sound erase itself for the music....

I can imagine that people without too much limit about money can afford to be a peculiar kind of audiophile.... I do not, my goal was to create a "good enough" audio system at very low cost.... I succeed....

With my "good enough" system i smile to new music, not so much to sound improvement now....

My cheap system is the best i ever listen to...I listen to Tannoy dual gold monitor and Magnepan, believe it or not, because they are well embed, and these others 2 were not, my modest Mission Cyrus speakers beats them....And none of my 6 headphones is better than  my speakers.... It was the contrary 2 years ago....

Embed everything before upgrading something..... 

:)
@mijostyn Well, we should agree to disagree -- I see no reason that one (with the means) would not want to haul out, say, electrostatic speakers and amps for a few months and then put those away for "box" speakers and their amps. To move between different style  DAC's, too. Not all parts of the system would be swapped out for variety's sake, but the notion that this idea isn't a reasonable one for some seems wrong. I think Guttenberg is on to something, though it's not how I roll....now.
I answered my own question.
It is distracting and misleading to listen to a lot of old, so so LPs.
But when I put on those relatively few good recordings THEN I HEAR THE FULL POTENTIAL. And I do have quite a few of those.
The ones I really like, I play twice or more. BUT, I still hesitate to spend $600+ on three records from Better-Records thinking of my $15 good sounding ones. I have had about 50% luck with 180 gram reissues. I did try 2 Hot Stampers and was not impressed enough to keep them. One, a Super Hot for $99, I could not listen to side 2! Sure, a lot of it depends on liking the music.
The other bottom line is “good enough is good enough”.
But in upgrading there is a real effort to upgrade the sound. It is not merely “shopaholic”. I always think that I love the sound until I do even a small upgrade. With Covid I am listening to my system much more than ever. And because we are now not traveling, I am more inclined to buy.I do listen to digital when I watch Amazon and Netflix at night.
Then it is great but intellectual. But the TT rig is emotional.
“Wow, it sounds great” compared to “wow, I am speechless”.
Dittos to millercarbon. And others. Satisfaction isn't the goal for some of us. If I'm satisfied with the sound I might say to myself "fascinating," and then try the next interesting idea that comes along and that I can afford to implement. I still enjoy music quite a bit even when my system is configured in ways I'm not satisfied with, so the musical enjoyment remains consistent. 
“Can an “audiophile” ever be satisfied with a system?“

Absolutely! Until they’re not.