Your system quality vs. recording quality


This is what I find frustrating.  Some recordings sound amazing, even better with a great system.   And then there are recordings that just don’t sound good.  And these recordings are from very good performers (why didn’t they put out a better quality recording?? Is it that difficult?).

A revealing system will highlight problem recordings.

No matter how much is spent on quality components, it’s very hard to make subpar recordings sound great.
A profound dilemma.




emergingsoul
+1 Mapman. And there is are many releases that suffer from poor recording and/or production. Some of my favorites are those recorded 'live' in the studio. 
There's been tracks i've played at the shop that had the salesman running for the volume knob, but at home the very same recording sounds great. Sometimes putting an acoustic panel at the first reflection point will save an old brittle recording, sometimes they just suck, but then why do they sound so freakin' good in my truck?
Another thing is if you’re system is in the zone and you actually like music most recordings will draw you in not chase you away.

If not then two possibilities are something needs to change and/or maybe you don’t like music as much as you think you do.
1+ @mapman  A good system makes everything sound better. I listen to some very old Louis Armstrong stuff. By modern standards it is pretty poor but just listen to him play that horn. It is like the tarnish on an old photograph. It belongs there. I also think you have to give the artist some leeway. Perhaps they want you to hear it a certain way. Listen to a Fiona Apple disc. 
For sure some recordings are better than others but your music system should play your records in a way that is satisfying to you. The goal is to have 80% of your collection sound good. If only 10% of your music sounds good, you need to work on your tune-up.