Schumann Resonator

Could you please elaborate and substantiate - how many 7 figure (currency of denomination?) systems have you listened to and where, and what components were they comprised of? Any supporting evidence you can cite would be extremely helpful to both the specific case you are litigating in this thread about Schumann generators, but even more generally, would help advance the views and recommendations you espouse at large when it comes to the pursuit of sonic primacy.

You misread my intention or perhaps i was not communicating them adequately...


I NEVER affirm that my system is BETTER than a 7 figures system "per se"...


I am not stupid...Affirming so will be stupid...

I only say that when i listened to youtube some 7 figures system, at least at 2 different memorable occasions, that reveal EVEN through the limitations of mine the limit of the room where they worked...Any experienced acoustician already know that a good system in a bad room could sound bad.... I verify this by accident many times listening youtube... You cannot assess anything on youtube BUT harshness and unnatural timbre sometimes is truly there and not in my system testing with the same files...

I affirm that i was so glad with mine than i prefered mine....this is my truth...


BUT i dont say this in relation with the use of my Schumann generators at all...

I use 1 hundred resonators, with many connections in my room, with Helmholtz tubes and pipes,and bottles with near 45 "golden plates" all along my electrical grid with many other devices....I even use ionizers with great success....

The reason why my system pleased me is the SUM of all this not the results of the S.G. mainly and only...

Dont use my words against me....

Read it like i intent to communicate them.... I know that saying that with the S.G. matter will make it like a false CLAIM about S.G. use...


I already said it CLEARLY that S.G. cannot be used generally like the FIRST working embedding controls...

Is it clear? I hope so...

My Helmoltz pipes and tubes grid is more impactful on the room than the S.G. and work and add completely different qualities to the system...

I affirm that Helmholtz acoustic science is more helpful than any UPGRADE at any cost yes....The S.G. is very good but way less impactful for example...

Ultimate Schumann Resonator
Direct out-of-the-factory price SR-003 (C$580) / SR-200 (C$780) / SR-300 (C$980) / SR-2000 (C$1,480)

Special NEW AGE products promotion discount:

C$80 less for any SR models

SR-003 after discount C$499 only [US$ 424 only!]

SR-200 after discount C$699 only [US$ 594 only!]

SR-300 after discount C$899 only [US$ 764 only!]

SR-2000 after discount C$1,380 only [US$ 1173 only!]

I NEVER RECOMMENDED TO BUY COSTLY DEVICE....

Experiment with cheap one ....

If the cheap one work why buying costly one?

This will discourage other to experiment by themselves...

I bought myself no tweaks and no costly product...

Be creative and keep your money....

Consumerism is what plague audiophile thread, and forbid the real question : How to improve the experience at low cost working with the controls of the embeddings dimensions of the system: mechanical, electrical and acoustical....

We need minimal science and minimal money nothing else with experimenting....

@mahregister

Thanks for the reply - ’tis much appreciated.

Would it be possible for you to send us a link to at least one of the YouTube 7 figure systems in action (the more, the sonically merrier) that were inferior to yours in some way (due to absent/insufficient room acoustics or otherwise), and ideally, videos/audio of your system playing the same music, so that the Agon community can corroborate your claims? Many will dispute the validity of YouTube as a sound/appropriate comparator (and perhaps rightfully so), but if was good enough for your assessments, we will gladly take them under advisement.

Even if you cannot supply videos of your system going tete a tete with those extravagant systems, I’m sure the community would still find it helpful to hear those systems and their deficiencies first hand, so that we can further our understanding of the art and science of audiophilia.

It's better to wait until after a thunderstorm to listen in order to get natural resonances. I find it far superior to man made generators. 

Would it be possible for you to send us a link to at least one of the YouTube 7 figure systems in action (the more, the sonically merrier) that were inferior to yours in some way (due to absent/insufficient room acoustics or otherwise), and ideally, videos/audio of your system playing the same music, so that the Agon community can corroborate your claims?

No... I dont want to provoke useless controversies and arguing that will not make any sense...

I think you misread my intention...

An anecdote is an anecdote not a proof especially not with youtube...

I will be clear: i only say that walking among examples of system on youtube i discovered to my amazement that i PREFERED mine.. This is an ANECDOTE.... Not a claim...

Now i must explain, i would have to explain for myself, this real surprizing experience for me by what?

My gear has certainly not the same potential that more refine costly gear...Then why?

I detected problem linked to acoustical room control and probably also to the 2 other embeddings mechanical and electrical about the systems i listen to on youtube...By the way go on youtube and listen to speakers working in a showroom more than half sound bad....The speakers are certainly good one...It does not take a genius to figure out why they sound bad....

You want to read my anecdote about the importance of acoustical control like a claim about the superiority of my system.... IT IS NOT...

Then dont give me a bait to throw further controversies about naming particular system...

I am not an idiot....

What is affirmed by me is this: The tuning and controlling of the working dimensions of a system is way more important than the price of the system and may cost very few dollars to install...

That is my claim... And this claim is for me TRUTH and experience....

My audio system is low cost and average but satisfied me on all counts not because the gear is extraordinary, but because the acoustic, mechancial aspect, and electrical grid are under minimal controls...

This is my POINT...I never pretended that my system is better than any other one in the absolute sense, i pretend to like it now more than many others , why? because of my embeddings experiments controls devices....

Helmhotz tubes and pipes cost NOTHING to try and this is pure acoustic science not anecdotes or even claims...Pure VERIFIED science....They cause an upgrade superior to many other possible gear upgrades... This is science not taste....

It is not then my system itself , it is the way we install ANY system which is important.... And your desire to create a controversy, by picking my lived anecdote to illustrate this uncontroversial fact , the importance of tuning a system with his room, is not to my taste nor in my intention...

It is not the price of the system, it is the controls of the working dimensions that are the KEY to audiophile experience...

Is it clear?