Schumann Resonator


I got 2 of these from Amazon...careful that free returns are applicable.  I charged them up, turned them on and holy moly.....they do help with my system.   What I hear is clarity....space between instruments, a definite difference in upright and electric bass, wider soundstage...you know...all the good stuff. At first I thought it might be increased brightness, but no....it is still the same in that regard.  I still can't believe it, and will listen again tomorrow (saved the packaging for the return)...but today, I'm about to keep them.
128x128stringreen

Ultimate Schumann Resonator
Direct out-of-the-factory price SR-003 (C$580) / SR-200 (C$780) / SR-300 (C$980) / SR-2000 (C$1,480)

Special NEW AGE products promotion discount:

C$80 less for any SR models

SR-003 after discount C$499 only [US$ 424 only!]

SR-200 after discount C$699 only [US$ 594 only!]

SR-300 after discount C$899 only [US$ 764 only!]

SR-2000 after discount C$1,380 only [US$ 1173 only!]

I NEVER RECOMMENDED TO BUY COSTLY DEVICE....

Experiment with cheap one ....

If the cheap one work why buying costly one?

This will discourage other to experiment by themselves...

I bought myself no tweaks and no costly product...

Be creative and keep your money....

Consumerism is what plague audiophile thread, and forbid the real question : How to improve the experience at low cost working with the controls of the embeddings dimensions of the system: mechanical, electrical and acoustical....

We need minimal science and minimal money nothing else with experimenting....


@mahregister

Thanks for the reply - ’tis much appreciated.

Would it be possible for you to send us a link to at least one of the YouTube 7 figure systems in action (the more, the sonically merrier) that were inferior to yours in some way (due to absent/insufficient room acoustics or otherwise), and ideally, videos/audio of your system playing the same music, so that the Agon community can corroborate your claims? Many will dispute the validity of YouTube as a sound/appropriate comparator (and perhaps rightfully so), but if was good enough for your assessments, we will gladly take them under advisement.

Even if you cannot supply videos of your system going tete a tete with those extravagant systems, I’m sure the community would still find it helpful to hear those systems and their deficiencies first hand, so that we can further our understanding of the art and science of audiophilia.
It's better to wait until after a thunderstorm to listen in order to get natural resonances. I find it far superior to man made generators. 
Would it be possible for you to send us a link to at least one of the YouTube 7 figure systems in action (the more, the sonically merrier) that were inferior to yours in some way (due to absent/insufficient room acoustics or otherwise), and ideally, videos/audio of your system playing the same music, so that the Agon community can corroborate your claims?
No... I dont want to provoke useless controversies and arguing that will not make any sense...

I think you misread my intention...

An anecdote is an anecdote not a proof especially not with youtube...

I will be clear: i only say that walking among examples of system on youtube i discovered to my amazement that i PREFERED mine.. This is an ANECDOTE.... Not a claim...

Now i must explain, i would have to explain for myself, this real surprizing experience for me by what?

My gear has certainly not the same potential that more refine costly gear...Then why?

I detected problem linked to acoustical room control and probably also to the 2 other embeddings mechanical and electrical about the systems i listen to on youtube...By the way go on youtube and listen to speakers working in a showroom more than half sound bad....The speakers are certainly good one...It does not take a genius to figure out why they sound bad....

You want to read my anecdote about the importance of acoustical control like a claim about the superiority of my system.... IT IS NOT...

Then dont give me a bait to throw further controversies about naming particular system...

I am not an idiot....

What is affirmed by me is this: The tuning and controlling of the working dimensions of a system is way more important than the price of the system and may cost very few dollars to install...

That is my claim... And this claim is for me TRUTH and experience....

My audio system is low cost and average but satisfied me on all counts not because the gear is extraordinary, but because the acoustic, mechancial aspect, and electrical grid are under minimal controls...

This is my POINT...I never pretended that my system is better than any other one in the absolute sense, i pretend to like it now more than many others , why? because of my embeddings experiments controls devices....

Helmhotz tubes and pipes cost NOTHING to try and this is pure acoustic science not anecdotes or even claims...Pure VERIFIED science....They cause an upgrade superior to many other possible gear upgrades... This is science not taste....

It is not then my system itself , it is the way we install ANY system which is important.... And your desire to create a controversy, by picking my lived anecdote to illustrate this uncontroversial fact , the importance of tuning a system with his room, is not to my taste nor in my intention...

It is not the price of the system, it is the controls of the working dimensions that are the KEY to audiophile experience...

Is it clear?





mahgister - it seems like English is a second language for you, so kudos.

But could you try writing more clearly? I am not talking spelling or conjunctions, just "universal grammar" and consistency and less ambiguity - stuff that is not culture and specific language-dependent, but simply requires clear thinking (in any language!).

It is extremely frustrating to read your hogwash at times.