Schumann Resonator

Whomever finds it difficult to understand mahgister certainly does not speak for all.
I have no difficulty understanding him.

These have been on my list of things to try, as have Mahgister's golden plates.

I will look to get some try and report. I've tried a fair few esoteric items now and some of them have been nothing short of remarkable PPT mats and total contact being some examples.

Someone on here commented that there are things you can measure but not hear but there is nothing you can hear but not measure. How can you be so sure of that?

How do you measure soundstage depth and the separation of elements in the mix ? These are things I can clearly hear with improvements to my system over the last 2 years. However Mahgister is right in saying that you can make improvements and not hear anything because you have not lowered the noise floor enough.

Start with the room and speaker interactions such as speakers matching the room and position within the room. Controlling room response with treatments (or in my case just normal furnishings and Lyngdorf room perfect). Then get the power supply and earthing of the system right.

Once you have these then you can start to hear improvements from resonance and vibrations of your system. I suspect the s.gs start to become "audible" at this point too and this is also where good cabelling and fuses (not necessarily expensive) starts to make more audible differences.

I think this is pretty much in line with Mahgister's embeddings experiences.

You can buy 60,000$ speakers and 30000$ components and put them in a 'bad room" for them, then wire your system with ground loops and have shifty power (although well designed kit can negate much of this).

Put that against a well set up $5000 system with the right tweaks , well implemented and set up and YES you could easily get better sound.

Implement a $100000 system correctly and YES it will out perform the $5k one sure.

The art of the audiophile is putting a system together that is cohesive and I for one would love to hear Mahgister's system I'm sure it does sound very good.

I will report back my findings on s.g's thanks 

Disco

@thecarpathian

Love as an emotion cannot be scientifically quantified.
A machine that creates a specific resonance can.

Sorry, I have limited experience with androids

"The amount of knowledge we have about the universe is 0.0000....%"
You are confusing the word ’we’ with the word ’I’.

So if I say, "We are humans" for you I should use "I"?

"I don’t understand the source of gravity but I know it’s there."
The source of gravity is literally any and everything that has mass.

This has that is not the same as how or why

@stringreen - I like to thank the OP for starting this post.  This is the first time I've heard of SR and the tweak is cheap to try.

@Mahgister, thanks for sharing your tips

I find this SR speculation/discussion fascinating.   Physics vs biological, maybe both?  Perhaps there is not a direct correlation aka other factors or layers are involved.  Hard to pinpoint because the "perceived" SR improvements are not measurable.

Interesting, English is also my second language. I have absolutely no problem understanding the meaning and intention of what mahgister writes; something that I cannot say about the writings of many who post on this forum and for whom English is the first. Moreover, if one considers what he writes about music it is clear that he is an extremely astute and insightful listener and, more importantly, music lover; if passionately exuberant. The link between language and musical skills is well documented. Others may disagree, but for me those are reasons enough to not be too quick to dismiss what he has to say about most things music and audio.

I know perfectly well how to read  the English of very good writer, and consequently know that mine is very bad and approximative at best...

But i hope understandable...

I am very humbled and deeply pleased by your appreciation tough...

My deepest regards.....