Townshend Audio Podiums: The Full Review


I’ve been fascinated with the importance of vibration control for more than three decades now. A lot of my experience is already covered in Millercarbon's Mega Vibration Control Journey https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/millercarbon-s-mega-vibration-control-journey The Journey ended with springs. Then I got Pods, and wrote Vibration Control and the Townshend Audio Seismic Pods https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/vibration-control-and-the-townshend-audio-seismic-pods Now as we continue our journey forward it is time to review the Townshend Audio Podiums.  

Podiums are based on the same basic engineering used in Pods. A spring is encased in a rubber sleeve that functions as a sort of bellows, trapping the air inside. At the top the spring is attached to a threaded metal plate with a single very precise small hole in it. The threads are for height adjustment and the hole is to allow air to pass through. A very small, precision-controlled amount of air. This tiny little hole allows the air to function as a damper.  

A fundamental challenge with springs is they bounce. We want them to bounce. But we do not want them to keep bouncing! When that happens we say it resonates, and resonance adds color. It is a form of distortion, and we don’t want it. Springs all by themselves are already very good at isolation. Please read the above threads to see just how good they are. But even as good as they are springs do have this problem of resonance.  

The problem with damping is figuring out how to achieve it, and how much to use? The air valve method Max Townshend invented uses only a couple percent damping ratio and does this with air alone and no moving parts. Genius!  

The four damped spring towers are attached to a very dense, massive and inert plinth. My traditional knuckle rap test yielded a very satisfactory ’thunk’. Stiff and highly damped, it is also covered in an extremely durable and beautiful finish. Sliding speakers on and off left zero marks on them, and they really are handsome to look at.  

The damped spring towers at each corner are threaded for two different leveling adjustments. The first is to level the unloaded Podium on the floor. This first step eliminates any problems or situations where the floor is not perfectly level. This adjustment (if necessary) is made with a special thin wrench that comes supplied with the Podiums.

The speakers are then placed on the Podiums and fine tuned for precision placement. At this point, loaded with 150lbs worth of Moabs, making fine positioning adjustments on my thick carpet proved a bit of a challenge. The solution I came up with was BDR Round Things under the footers. Furniture gliders would probably also work. If it is even a problem. My carpet and pad are very thick. They do look like they will work beautifully on hardwood flooring.  

Once perfectly positioned the speakers are raised by turning the knobs at each corner. There is a process to doing this. First all four are turned equally, until all four corners are floating free and clear. It is essential to allow freedom of motion in all planes. Once this is achieved then the speakers can be adjusted perfectly level by turning the knobs in pairs- the two on the left or right, or the two on the front or back. Adjusting in pairs this way avoids diagonal rocking.  

Describing this process in print is hard but doing it in practice is easy. In fact this was the coolest part of setting them up! With the Podiums I was able to place my level right on the Podium. Even fully loaded with about 150lbs of Moabs and BDR the knobs turn silky smooth, and precision leveling is super easy.

Okay, okay, so how do they sound? In a word: wonderful! This can’t come as much of a surprise. They are after all basically Pods attached to a plinth, and the Pods work wonderfully under everything I have tried. Still, the Podiums are pretty impressive.  

The first thing I noticed was improvement in the direction of what I would call a more natural sound. Natural sounds are almost never described as having glare or strain. Natural sounds can be quite loud. But there is a difference in nature between a loud natural sound and the same sound through a system. They may measure the same volume but we have no trouble hearing the difference.

At this point I have to agree with Max and say that the difference is ringing. Natural sounds start and stop very quickly. Sounds reproduced by our systems cause the system itself to vibrate, then the room, and the room feeds back into the system until the whole thing is ringing like a bell. This all happens very fast and can be seen demonstrated on a seismograph placed on a speaker. https://youtu.be/BOPXJDdwtk4?t=6

In any case, whatever the explanation it is clear there is a lot less glare and strain with speakers on the Townshend Podiums. This results for me in a lot less listener fatigue. Another thing I find is that while I don’t necessarily need to turn the volume up, when I do it is way more enjoyable! The combination of speakers like Moabs capable of playing very loud and strain-free with Podiums is intoxicating!

The next thing I’m hearing is a massive improvement in what I would call truth of timbre, or tone, or whatever you want to call it that makes each individual instrument sound more like itself and not any other. Not the big differences that distinguish a steel from a string guitar, but the little details that distinguish one wood-bodied gut-stringed guitar from another. Not hyped-up count the spittle hitting the mic details either but the sort of tonal shadings that distinguish the real vocal talent from the second-tier. Even now after more than a month on Podiums still I put on records that have me going Wow that wood block really is a wood block!  

This is why I spent so much time explaining Max’s damping mechanism. Before Podiums my Moabs were on springs. The load was the same, and the springs were properly sized for the load. However, the springs on my DIY platforms were not damped. Consequently, they had their characteristic resonance. This resonance colors everything played on them. Like viewing the world through rose-colored glasses- you may like what you see but that ain’t the world! Now on Podiums the world as presented by the Moabs is full blown Ultra Panavision 70! https://vashivisuals.com/the-hateful-eight-ultra-panavision-70/

Those who follow me know I am not just about sound quality, I am also about value. Because I am so passionate about sound quality, but have only limited resources, I have to be. No way I have enough money to go chasing the latest and greatest. One look at my system anyone can see how hard I will work if it will get the job done for less. https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/8367 

For sure springs will do a very fine job for very low cost. Just about any spring, properly tuned and used, will outperform an awful lot of stuff that costs a whole lot more. For sure anyone in the market for good vibration control solutions- and that should be everyone! - should consider springs. But Townshend Podiums are so much better than ordinary springs that I have to say that even at their price they are not just as good value, but even better. They are that good.


128x128millercarbon
Right prof. But let us set all that aside. The following little exercise is something I started doing all by myself back in the 90’s. People like to talk about marginal returns, always assuming it is less and less, on which I disagree, but whatever, let us call this miller’s rule of marginal returns.

Miller’s rule of marginal returns is when the improvement is worth it (and you can afford it!) then you do it. That simple.

Worth it, compared to what? Why anything else you could do, of course! Usually that means a better component. So let us consider Townshend Podiums in light of Miller’s rule of marginal returns. Should we buy them? Are they worth $2k or whatever?

Well now, I have never heard Tekton Ulfberht’s but teajay has and he informed me in no uncertain terms they are only very very slightly better than Moabs, and even then the improvement is almost entirely in the one small band of bass impacted by the extra woofers. Well, my Moabs on Townshend Podiums have imaging, detail, and truth of timbre that is quite a bit obviously better, including with a lot better bass.

My Moabs on Podiums at about $2300 are half what it would cost to upgrade to Ulf’s, and so the marginal return on Podiums is greater than the upgrade and highly recommended purely on the basis of sound quality per dollar.

Different people will of course think of different speakers. Not the point. You are free to choose and go with whatever you want. You can choose Totem, you can choose Harbeth, you can choose Wilson. Don’t care! To each his own! All that matters is when you try em you wind up realizing it was more improvement than you could have got from changing speakers.

All that matters.
I dont understand at all why someone can contest the benefit of isolation... The problem is what is the best results possible? i dont doubt the Tonwshend platform reviewers....I am pretty sure the product is very good...

Myself i cannot buy for a 500 bucks system a so costly design....

Marginal returns cannot be meaningful for me ....The relation between increase of positive S.Q./ cost of the device, is not significant in my case because the device exceed many times the cost of my system....My homemade device on the other hand cost peanuts....

What is significant is the effect of springs vibrations controls on my audio system.... It is huge and irreplaceable by any other devices .... It cannot be replaced by controls in acoustical or electrical working dimensions for sure.... Then in a more costly system than mine the addition of the Townshend platform is justified by the improbability to obtain better isolating result by any other means, and the impossibility to replace vibrations controls improvement in any way by other means than vibration device control anyway....

The problem is simple in my experience: Almost all people are completely unconscious of the negative impact of any source of noise in their system... Be it mechanical electrical or acoustical....Nobody can listen to his noise floor and say i know where you are "noise floor" now, dont hide yourself anymore! 😁😊

This is the reason why they spend money in the wrong place most of the times and upgrade an already good dac, or amplifier or even speakers without having never listen to them at their peak potential....

Isolation was mandatory for me.... My 2 speakers were on the same desk than my gear....My homade  sandwich isolation device was very good before springs, BUT they introduced a "tuning" that was not what we all wish for unbeknownst to me....Coupling/decoupling tune the speakers in a negative way most of the times.... Springs isolate first.... They dont tune first....And modulo some precaution they finely isolate without too much tuning of their own...And i let my sandwich under the springs then even the springs are relatively isolated ....
😊😊

Ever wonder why people hate audiophiles?
If you hate audiophiles, with all that goes on in the world, you have a big problem...

I am pretty sure you hate many other people or insignificant things...

Myself i dont even hate myself....Read a book, you will have no more time to hate, working synchronized neurons are mute....



Myself i cannot buy for a 500 bucks system a so costly design
Well, at least you are speaking for yourself.
In my case, I would pay money for a properly designed and constructed isolation platform, as I am busy making a living.

I do not doubt your isolation system performs adequately, but I take exception to your denigrating a product solely due to price. 
Now, if you could install the Townshend or any other isolation device and compare it to yours, then I would find a reason to accept your point of view.
B