I was hoping you could provide more of an argumentFIRST- the effect of the S.G. in an audio system IS OR IS NOT related to the precise set of frequencies called Schumann resonance; i dont know, i doubt that a 10 bucks chinese S.G. is very precise and anything i read was not clear about that effect of Schuman resonance in audio save the publicity to sells costly models... I dont bought costly "tweaks" at all anyway...I prefer homemade one of my own creation or modified cheap devices...
SECOND- you insult me already in your first post about gullible people and con man, when i only speak about a 20 bucks fun and interesting experiment..
THIRD- i already precisely described, in the post preceding your first here, the precise audible acoustic effect of the S.G. in my room for my ears in relation to a very precise acoustical experience and objective concept: the " listener envelopment" sound experience...
I even proposed already a simple set of experiments repeatable with precise effects to verify the existence of an objective effect by the S.G. Is it not better than argument for or against?
This is not perhaps "arguments" like arguments in pitch sale for S.G. costly model, this is only precise acoustic concept and precise experiments i propose to the reader...I dont have "argument", no, we dont argue here, we try experimenting and perhaps ,after that, we try to describe the acoustical experience with the precise acoustical concept you seems to not knows anyway, the"listener envelopment"...
It is not enough? You wanted a tested scientific theory written for you before buying 20 bucks toy for an experiment? Or you call the police to arrest the con men you already insulted? Are you a standing comic?
My intention was not to insult you, just point out where you erred in your analysis or judgement.FOUR- i erred in " analysis" and "judgement" in proposing a fun and simple experiment? i repeat, are you a standing comic?
It goes beyond hypocrisy to insult and attack the messenger while not adding anything to the coherent conversation.This is the end of your last post with insults.... And here your first post... Then WHO INSULT WHOM?
To borrow one of your tactics:
"Never argue with a sick mind" .....Joe Walsh
I wish you good luck and good mental health.
Yes, there are some people who believe in science and physics and not voodoo. There are people who are not gullible or naive and can realize when they are being conned. Some people don’t fall for the logical fallacy of "the appeal to authority", especially when the authority on science you are appealing to is Groucho Marx.
FIVE-English is not my first language and i apologize for my bad use of syntax etc...
By the wayhere is no mysticism in the way i speak of science in my last posts save for a very narrow mind sorry... And i an not here in this thread to propose argument for a theory of Schuman resonance in audio or for selling S.G.... we speak about a simple, possibly rewarding, anyway funny EXPERIMENT...No argument could never replace an experiment... you boast about science and you dont know that? or science is only a belief for you perhaps?
And note when you speak about my "cunning" of people that i sell nothing and only recommend to buy peanuts cost devices...I repeat i know but it is an important fact ....
I was hoping you could provide more of an argument than just a bunch of double talk and mysticism cloaked in bad grammar an improper English, but such is not the case.