Schumann Resonator

I was hoping you could provide more of an argument than just a bunch of double talk and mysticism cloaked in bad grammar an improper English, but such is not the case.
Schumann Resonance is well defined phenomenon and easily understood, but unfortunately, these devices can't possibly produce what they portend to, all evidence is against that argument.  You can try to make the diluted assertions that you don't understand (or care) how they produce an affect, but the most you can come up with is your personal experience which is subjective, unverifiable, and open to suspicion.  I would call it a pseudo-science (that which cannot be disproved) but it doesn't even rise to that level, it is just the rantings of a highly disorganized mind.  Throw in a few irrelevant quotes a bunch of disclaimers and some pious indignation and that pretty much covers your position.
My intention was not to insult you, just point out where you erred in your analysis or judgement.  It goes beyond hypocrisy to insult and attack the messenger while not adding anything to the coherent conversation.
To borrow one of your tactics:
"Never argue with a sick mind"   .....Joe Walsh
I wish you good luck and good mental health.

I was hoping you could provide more of an argument

FIRST- the effect of the S.G. in an audio system IS OR IS NOT related to the precise set of frequencies called Schumann resonance; i dont know, i doubt that a 10 bucks chinese S.G. is very precise and anything i read was not clear about that effect of Schuman resonance in audio save the publicity to sells costly models... I dont bought costly "tweaks" at all anyway...I prefer homemade one of my own creation or modified cheap devices...

SECOND- you insult me already in your first post about gullible people and con man, when i only speak about a 20 bucks fun and interesting experiment..



THIRD- i already precisely described, in the post preceding your first here, the precise audible acoustic effect of the S.G. in my room for my ears in relation to a very precise acoustical experience and objective concept: the " listener envelopment" sound experience...
I even proposed already a simple set of experiments repeatable with precise effects to verify the existence of an objective effect by the S.G. Is it not better than argument for or against?

This is not perhaps "arguments" like arguments in pitch sale for S.G. costly model, this is only precise acoustic concept and precise experiments i propose to the reader...I dont have "argument", no, we dont argue here, we try experimenting and perhaps ,after that, we try to describe the acoustical experience with the precise acoustical concept you seems to not knows anyway, the"listener envelopment"...

It is not enough? You wanted a tested scientific theory written for you before buying 20 bucks toy for an experiment? Or you call the police to arrest the con men you already insulted? Are you a standing comic?

My intention was not to insult you, just point out where you erred in your analysis or judgement.

FOUR- i erred in " analysis" and "judgement" in proposing a fun and simple experiment? i repeat, are you a standing comic?

It goes beyond hypocrisy to insult and attack the messenger while not adding anything to the coherent conversation.
To borrow one of your tactics:
"Never argue with a sick mind" .....Joe Walsh
I wish you good luck and good mental health.

This is the end of your last post with insults.... And here your first post... Then WHO INSULT WHOM?

Yes, there are some people who believe in science and physics and not voodoo. There are people who are not gullible or naive and can realize when they are being conned. Some people don’t fall for the logical fallacy of "the appeal to authority", especially when the authority on science you are appealing to is Groucho Marx.

FIVE-English is not my first language and i apologize for my bad use of syntax etc...

By the wayhere is no mysticism in the way i speak of science in my last posts save for a very narrow mind sorry... And i an not here in this thread to propose argument for a theory of Schuman resonance in audio or for selling S.G.... we speak about a simple, possibly rewarding, anyway funny  EXPERIMENT...No argument could never  replace an experiment... you boast about science and you dont know that? or science is only a belief for you perhaps?

And note when you speak about my "cunning" of people that i sell nothing and only recommend to buy peanuts cost devices...I repeat i know but it is an important fact ....

I was hoping you could provide more of an argument than just a bunch of double talk and mysticism cloaked in bad grammar an improper English, but such is not the case.

I was hoping you could provide more of an argument

I forget to say that if you want an argument i only have one...

Probably because these chinese device are cheap and not very precise the audible effect linked to what is the "listener envelopment" experience in acoustic is not related to the precise Schuman resonance anyway...

It is probably a result of the coupling of this device and his own low frequency impulse with our audio system in the same electrical grid which produce an audible effect through the electrical noise floor...

It is easy to verify with my experiment number 2:

Put a shungite piece over the capacitor of the device: compression of the sound..

Put an herkimer diamond only : the sound is more airy and perhaps too much...

Put the shungite add copper tape on his external face+ an herkimer diamond: the audible effect is more balanced and more musical...


Then before calling the police against a conman , try something easy to verify and better than only a "spoken argument" that will never convince any "skeptic club member" anyway and which is useless to those who have tried it successfully or not...

and refrain to insult in beginning or in ending post and even all along the post....

There is no argument in your 2 posts, in mine, there is a first experiment , then a precise acoustic concept description experience, and after that a second experiment with verifiable effects and finally an argument for the reason of the possible S.G. effect assuming no link with the Schumann resonance phenomena...

If i am "sick" i am coherently articulated even with my bad English....

Anyway my best to you without any backmind toughts, life is short.....

Took the OP’s challenge. Ordered a 16.97 device which arrived on 3/15.I’ve also been working with 10 HFT’s for a few weeks. They are amazing and worth every penny. As some Brits would say, I'm gobsmacked by the HFT's.

Over the last 3 days, I have tried the SG in 4 different locations and the results have been exactly the same. An intense pressure right between my eyes coupled with general anxiety and tension. Just the opposite of relaxation. The effect goes away as soon as the device is turned off. Regarding sound, there is absolutely no change that I can hear. I have considered that my physical discomfort may be affecting how I hear but I would think if that were the case, things would sound worse, not exactly the same.

Ordered some PHT today. Can’t wait to try those.

 I have tried the SG in 4 different locations and the results have been exactly the same. An intense pressure right between my eyes coupled with general anxiety and tension.

Sorry for your discomfort.... electro sensibility is scientific fact linked to some device around the house for some people and it seems that S.G. can induce some  unwishes one...

Thanks for your interesting report and useful one indeed....