Cables ... no longer opinion


PS Audio has already did the research. The answers are available forevermore.
The testing is sound, and not flawed. Their test results find exactly the same results my cable manufacturer found and preached. Josh from Downsize Audio Cables also found two strips of foils, stacked on top of each other and secured together made the best sounding speaker cables. I've tried all kinds of hyper expensive cables to dethrone the Downsize Audio foils ... NOTHING comes close at any price.
      Downsize used a genuine teflon backed adhesive tape, double sided too, and custom rolled, extra thin foil of 6N purity. BUT he told me a person can get 90% of the same sound quality, using off the shelf inductor foils and standard thin packing tape. Try it and save tens of thousands of dollars.
https://www.psaudio.com/copper/article/the-sound-of-speaker-cables-an-analysis/
flaxxer
Take my word for it, you have not heard truly 3D holographic imaging if you are not using a cable with this geometry.



I would make the generalized statement that anyone who makes a generalized statement like this is prone to hyperbole and couples that with a profound yet fundamental misunderstanding of imaging. Alas, they have a platform.

I understand that cabling geometry would do and could do something for a better imaging like the other pieces of gear will help if they are well chosen....I dont doubt that....

But imaging is FIRST and LAST a result of acoustical controls methods....All there is,between these first and last steps, are welcome improvement but if someone want a good imaging and soundstage and more important than that a good "listener envelopment" experience with a good "source width experience" linked to it, a cable geometry, a good dac, and a very good amplifier will not be enough....At ANY price....

My experience and experiments confirm that to me.... Feel free to contradict me but i know what i speak about because i did it myself....



A TEST:
Pick Kurt Weill recording album 1958 "Three pennies opera" "Die Dreigroschenoper " with Lotte Lenya...

The recording engineer here was great and he put these mics at the different spot with art...

All along the opera, the voices are heard like in a 4 speakers system, coming in my right ears and left ears from my back, with the orchestra behind the speakers which are in front of me...My entire room is on the theater scene ....

Then i am on the theater among them....Not bad for a 500 bucks stereo system.... Try this opera with any gear and system at any price, if the room is not under control, the voices timbre will be unnatural, and you will not experience this music like if your stereo system suddenly become a 4 speakers system....

Acoustic is powerful.... Electronic is only the first step to Hi-Fi experience, i know that saying this will contradict what most people here think about audio...

Remember that i never upgraded my system for the last 3 years, and all my improvement cost me peanuts, the most important one being acoustic devices control....

I am a bit tired of cable wars, tubes/S.S. wars and digital/analog wars....

All these wars has proved to me that most people have no understanding of what really matters....

The three embeddings controls, but MAINLY the acoustical one is HUGE.....

Audio is almost equal to acoustic......

For example if the recording engineer on this Kurt Weill opera had not been a great master of acoustic, this recording would not have contained the necessary cues for my acoustic experience, and if my room have not been under controls  MY EARS/BRAIN  would have never been able to extract FROM MY ACTIVATED ROOM the information/cues contained in the recording files and recreate them in my room....And for this experience acoustic controls matters, never mind the price of the audio system....My 500 bucks audio system did it better than most costly one in a bad room.... Almost all rooms are, if not squarely bad, not optimal at all, unbeknownst to most....




Which btw, thanks for that, flaxxer.
You say the cutest things that only souls who think like you would understand and I’m so thankful I’m not one of them.
Seems I overlooked the fact that the handle for the OP is flaxxer, so, my bad. I'm just used to you using all manner of jargon to describe people. Everything else I said is as said.

All the best,
Nonoise
Two ribbons placed together is obviously the best for SPEAKER cables. It's an immediate consequence of Maxwell's Equations. Just as two small conductors separated by a significant distance is the best for line level. That's assuming equal dielectric to take dielectric absorption out of the picture.

Doesn't require an experiment. It's immediate from the physics.
You can think of it as (1) speakers must have low inductance and (2) line level must have low capacitance. The cables and the equipment terminations form LR and RC filters respectively. But it doesn't matter much if lengths are short.