We all know audio reproduction is outside known physics and human audibility limits. To think silly things like placebo effect or confirmation bias could remotely apply to humans in their den of audio tweaks is outlandish not to mention those crazy ABX or DB tests being relevant for anything other than testing mayonnaise.You always miss the point and then sarcastingly accuse all set of audiophiles to refuse to play the game of blindtest and refuse placebo effect...easy strawman argument....
Do you think that i think that placebo dont play for me in all my listening experiments? They do, saying otherwise and putting your words in my mouth is the perpetual strawman argument where you confine yourself in a false STATIC dichotomy between what is subjective and what is not....
But placebo live at the borderline frontier between audible and inaudible.... Only fool can explain with placebo, most effects "sustained", very audible change, in time tough.... Are you one?
And are you like those wo dont trust their own ears to the point refusing ANY listening experiments of their own in case they could be deluded by placebo ? Are you afraid of your own mother? Because placebo is the MOTHER of all perception by the way....
Science is not something from a comic book resembling a war between subjectivist and objectivist, it is a bit more complex and less stupid than these "cultist" distinction like in scientology between those who are "clear" and those who are not....With a "blindtest" two separate the to in an "audit"....
Dont need blindtest for my culinary experiment either , and for my contemplation of the "illusive" rainbow.....