jumia;
"It seems no matter how good a system is, the quality of recording quality takes priority".
"Good" according to whom????
You can assume that the more resolving your system, the more it will reveal the differences between recordings and highlight both the good and the bad.
You are the one who is going to be listening to your system and only you know which music is most important to you. There's little point in assembling a system that sounds sublime for genres you don't care about but is disappointing when it comes to what you really love.
For example, I've found that DACs vary enormously in this regard.Some are so resolving that all sense of the "forest" is lost because each "tree" is artificially hyped. . .never mind each tree-- more like every vein on every leaf! A lot of people seem to really like this effect. I'm not one of them. Maybe you do, but if not, there are other ways to go. That's the double-edged sword of this obsession... er, I meant, "hobby"-- there's a lot of gear to choose from.
There are also trends in recording. In the 80's, it was "cool" to make drums sound like trash cans being pounded inside a cement bunker.
Good luck making those sound good. Or maybe you like that... if so, I don't mean to insult you-- this was merely the first example that popped into my head. The fact is, whatever your tastes, you are bound to encounter CDs that do not please your ears, for one reason or another. Finally, "remastering" is not necessarily an improvement. Check out the Steve Hoffman Forums for discussion on the relative merits of different versions of any given CD.
"It seems no matter how good a system is, the quality of recording quality takes priority".
"Good" according to whom????
You can assume that the more resolving your system, the more it will reveal the differences between recordings and highlight both the good and the bad.
You are the one who is going to be listening to your system and only you know which music is most important to you. There's little point in assembling a system that sounds sublime for genres you don't care about but is disappointing when it comes to what you really love.
For example, I've found that DACs vary enormously in this regard.Some are so resolving that all sense of the "forest" is lost because each "tree" is artificially hyped. . .never mind each tree-- more like every vein on every leaf! A lot of people seem to really like this effect. I'm not one of them. Maybe you do, but if not, there are other ways to go. That's the double-edged sword of this obsession... er, I meant, "hobby"-- there's a lot of gear to choose from.
There are also trends in recording. In the 80's, it was "cool" to make drums sound like trash cans being pounded inside a cement bunker.
Good luck making those sound good. Or maybe you like that... if so, I don't mean to insult you-- this was merely the first example that popped into my head. The fact is, whatever your tastes, you are bound to encounter CDs that do not please your ears, for one reason or another. Finally, "remastering" is not necessarily an improvement. Check out the Steve Hoffman Forums for discussion on the relative merits of different versions of any given CD.