@perki
I kinda want this :)
Minus K
Yes, it's probably the superior passive
isolation money can buy. I was also looking into it for myself, and it's
really really expensive. I just can't (at the moment) work out how to justify the cost, make it look good and have it work with my stand mount speakers. But yeah, excellent products.
@nonoise - yeah, you're allright mate. I was a bit rude, I regret it now. Apologies.
Yes everything vibrates. But some will gladly play others by stoking
fear and uncertainty. Including fear that some undetected vibration will
negatively impact some audiophile’s sound. Once a fear of some problem
exists you can then sell some expensive esoteric fix that nobody would
care about otherwise. It’s how these things work. Marketing is all a
game you know.
@mapman Well the real issue here I take with that comment is that I have actually heard isolation done well, and you can choose to ignore the technology, however it damned well works.
I couldn't care less what brand is used. I do care that such a relevant advancement in the resolution and enjoyment for others would be stifled by misinformation based upon +30 year old ideologies.
And there's more advancement to be used in conjunction with broad frequency isolation, namely, tuned mass dampers. Stick to your guns, but don't mind those of us who are still going to tell you, that you are not correct.
Broad frequency isolation used on traditional speaker enclosures will absolutely improve the resolution of the loud speaker. And it helps with the structure the speakers are played within as well, the substrate, the walls, the component stands.
You are already enjoying broad frequency isolation when you are either a passenger or driving an automobile, perhaps it's time to move forward with your sound too? And even if not, hopefully others will at least discover for themselves that unfortunately, in the particular case, you are simply not correct.
