Crazy crazy crazy

rixthetrick I am giving you information straight from the supreme court, link is at an @gov site. There is more happening here than meets the eye.

I think that behind the covid crisis and the financial and economical crisis, we live a moment in time now where a spiritual crisis of the highest order manifest itself: "Who is human and who is not? " This question already appearing many times  in history is asked for the first time at this clear collective and individual level of consciousness....This question emerge through transhumanism...

All these crisis are linked together in ONE great crisis....Each one of this crisis reflect all the others... Then like you just clearly said:

" There is more happening here than meets the eye."

Yeah....The US Supreme Court in 2013 decided that MRNA vaccines not only change the host DNA, but after that DNA is changed, the new cDNA is a patentable commodity.

This is not a conspiracy theory. It is the law of the land.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf



@mahgister  A spiritual crisis is exactly what this is. 

Hi, Madg....

"...something is happening, and you don't know....what it is..."

Do we?  Or are we all paying attention the parts and pieces that more directly effect us, personally &/or in our profession?

Lots of moving parts, Moving....

A load of crap is what it is yuviarora.

@jond did you read the Supreme Court Decision? Or are you just offering your intuitive insight?
what part of this is crap? Please Elaborate.  Just wishing it to be crap does not work, legally speaking.  

"cDNA does not present the same obstacles to patentability as naturally occurring, isolated DNA segments. As already explained, creation of a cDNA sequence from mRNA results in an exons-only molecule that is not naturally occurring.8 Petitioners concede that cDNA differs from natural DNA in that “the non-coding regions have

been removed.” Brief for Petitioners 49. They nevertheless argue that cDNA is not patent eligible because “[t]he nucleotide sequence of cDNA is dictated by nature, not by the lab technician.” Id., at 51. That may be so, but the lab technician unquestionably creates something new when cDNA is made. cDNA retains the naturally occurring exons of DNA, but it is distinct from the DNA from which it was derived. As a result, cDNA is not a “product of nature” and is patent eligible under §101, except insofar as very short series of DNA may have no intervening introns to remove when creating cDNA. In that situation, a short strand of cDNA may be indistinguishable from natural DNA."
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf