One thing about Stereophile that annoys me is the comparison equipment they choose. It’s usually something like “I just happened to have a (component) laying around that hasn’t been used in 6 years “ and the price ranges may not even be remotely comparable. I remember when Art Dudley in one of his last columns reviewing a new Metronome CD player and using a 20 year old Sony as the comparison. I could understand some guy just starting a few site not having access to comparable gear, but the leading U.S. gear review magazine should have willing manufacturers ready to loan stuff for a review
Collective letter s to Stereophile
Why Stereophile magazine reviews (favors) only certain manufacturers? Mostly are already big corporations and established themselves in audio arena. Cary (almost every amp reviewed)Krell even get spotlight for the first speakers they ever made, that's FAIR! Mark Levinson and CJ same Musical Fidelity, B&W every single speaker, so as Revel and Dunlavy and Thiel to a certain degree but still in the spotlight. Ocasionaly one or two obscure companies make debut on the pages (usually scapegoats for the bad reviews). Where are the loudspeaker companies, here in the North America, that already established themselves as competative and superb performers? Meadowlark Audio, Coincident, Talon, AVALON, Tyler, Nova etc..! How about Spendor, Herbeth, Living Voice from UK, JM from France and many many more that do not even get mentioned?
Your take on this? Thanks!
Your take on this? Thanks!
- ...
- 39 posts total
- 39 posts total