What percentage of the time do you listen to records vs. digital sources?

At least 90% of my listening is from digital sources—primarily 5,000 CD’s ripped to WAV files.  Almost all of my listening to classical is digital—most releases in the past 25 years are available only from digital sources, modern classical recordings are very well done, short playing time interrupting a movement is not a problem, and quiet passages are not plagued by ticks and pops.

Older popular music and jazz is a different matter—a lot of digital reissues are pretty crappy—thin, brittle sounding and compressed.  I am quite lazy so I do put up with some sonic compromises, but, I do pull out favorite vinyl albums when I am in the mood.  

I listen to about 80% CDs and 20% vinyl. They both have their strengths and weaknesses. But when you hear an LP that sounds like this reissue of Kind of Blue, then you're hearing what analog can do better than digital >>>

https://store.acousticsounds.com/d/148512/Miles_Davis-Kind_of_Blue-UHQR_Vinyl_Record

Frank

ghdprentice and larryi,

My experience has been very similar to yours.
Digital  has gotten much friendlier, and the quality is now outstanding. Analog may still be a shade better, but the gap has narrowed considerably.

Well, in classical, there are those lps that have been released by Simon Rattle and the BPO in limited edition.
  I am 100% digital since I sold off my analog gear and lps about 6 years ago

around 40% LP's / 40% CD's, 20% 4 track pre-recorded Reel to Reel Tapes. No Streaming except Pandora in the Office, primarily to discover new to me artists.

Still buying LP's and CD's, new to me or replacing worn out favorites. Selling LP's and Tapes occasionally, but that's a lot of work for little gain.

The tape content is limited by the end of pre-recorded tape production.