How much “suspension of disbelief do you need?”


We (or most of us) believe that it’s very difficult if not impossible to hear an exact representation of the the sound of a live performance on a recording.
The question is how much do you have to delude yourself into thinking it’s the real thing your listening to, to satisfy yourself.
To some it has to to be as close as possible. But others can make allowances for defects in the sound in order to enjoy the presentation.

‘How much do you need?

 

rvpiano

Not expecting reality but just certain aspects of it. For me it mostly comes down to smooth extended frequency response on and off axis with minimal background noise and the ability to get fairly loud without excessive distortion, and an appropriate amount of room reverberation. Like others have said it can actually be better than reality a lot of the time. With ambient sounds that might plausibly be happening in or around my house my system can truly deceive me at times. 

+1 @fuzztone 

This really cracked me up...

"If he can’t get blasted without raising a stink he’s in the wrong century."

Regards,

barts

I do not agree that all concerts are mono. Several examples.

Pink Floyd - DSOTM Tour

Grateful Dead - any concert played through "The Wall of Sound" 

Steely Dan - Just saw them in Boston Nov 20th, definitely in stereo
                      but I was 10th row center, so the PA very well may have been
                      mono.

Regards,

barts
 

Yes, SELF DECEPTION is the point. This suspension of DIS belief helps create a feeling of the real thing. Just like in a movie or play. We know what’s happening on the screen or stage is not actually taking place but we suspend our disbelief so that we can think we’re witnessing something real.
In music this is easier with acoustic instruments or voices. As some have pointed out, coming close to reproducing the sounds from an actual rock concert with electronic instruments is not only almost impossible but maybe not even desirable.
‘The question I’m really posing is how CLOSE to the real thing does the recording have to come so that you can believe it’s in your listening space.
‘Many have said this doesn’t matter for them to enjoy the music. And that’s perfectly understandable if not desirable.  My post is directed at those who do care.

Movies are are sketchy example. Most writers lean away from real world in favor of sensational. Count me as one who don't care. It's nice when it happens "really" but the performance is more important. That said I'm big fan of Nightfly Live which never sounded like that except in the Donald's head.