To preamp or not to preamp. That is the question.

@alvinnir2 I will likely try something solid state, and see if it yields any improvement. There seems to be enough opinion here to support the fact that a preamp will improve things

Yep! This is the logical and most thorough approach. Compare both options and listen for yourself. Audio forums have endless threads about active preamp versus passive/direct connection to amplifier. Quite a few experience listeners have tried both and (As expected) each choice has its advocates.

In my listening experience,  the use of a high quality active preamplifier provides The better sounding option. However, that’s just my outcome experience and you need to find out for yourself.

Charles 

1000.00 dollars? Shop carefully, a mediocre preamplifier won’t elevate what you currently have. Preamplifier has to have good design, part quality and implementation. Otherwise it’s a pointless endeavor.

Charles

@charles1dad

+1

I would be careful not to underfund a preamp. I would recommend doubling your budget, and buy used. The preamp can really enhance your system. But a real budget one will not. I recommend a used tubed preamp not more than ten to fifteen years old.

I believe there is a PS Audio video on YouTube in which Paul says he now believes a preamp to be a necessary introduction to a stereo system.

I second, third, the need for a good preamp. As others have asked, what is your budget?

Bob

I'm a minimalist when it comes to signal path. 

Way back in the day, I drove an amp with my CD player. It was the shortest path. The problem was it sounded like a digital version of music. It didn't last the day, it was awful. The addition of a preamp smoothed out all the problems. If your system is good enough, it needs a good preamp.