I’ve been into high performance audio playback for almost 4 decades and I can’t say I’ve noticed any jaw dropping sound quality difference.
For whatever reason I felt that there seemed to be an actual dip in loudspeaker performance during the 1990s and the early 2000s.
Some folks still hold the original Quad ESL and the BBC LS3/5 in the highest regard. If there was any jaw dropping improvements in sound quality I’m sure they’d be very interested.
I’ve yet to hear the highly regarded Revel Salon 2s which always seem to be up there with the very best when it comes to comparisons.
It’s interesting to note that they are now a 14 year old design.
+1
The OP mentioned…
B&w every few years upgrades there speaker line and other manufacturers do this to. But because I have the earlier version does this mean it’s inferior? Cable manufactures do the same thing.
Well did any new technology go into those speakers?
Or what changes were made?
How much more effort is required too perfect a speaker? my speaker is several years old and all the gear and the speaker are all broken in. And now I’m being told to upgrade.
I guess it would be components and integration.
It may be easier to make a decent speaker now using mediocre components like drivers are crossovers.
But to make a more perfect speaker one would assumed that they need more perfect drivers… and also have them integrated.
I can count the drivers on one or two hands that are obviously a step up in some fashion.
The active speakers are a bit easier to make good at a cheaper price point.
I am so confused what should I do?
Personally I would not do a damned thing. Just play them until you find something that is obviously wrong with them, or something is obviously better in new speakers than in your the existing ones.
Maybe buy a new CD or LP every month or two...