It really depends on how demanding you are on the sound … what is good enough to make you happy. So for example, are you going to use your digital sound as background music while you work/read/play then getting things just right is not as important as if you were setting up for critical listening. I of course understand the urge to keep seeking out the next level. What I have discovered, going down the digital rabbit hole, is that better sound (at least to me) is about getting rid of noise/jitter. If that is the goal, then everything in the digital chain matters … from your ISP right through to the DAC output. Anyway, I digress. In most equipment a separate DAC is better isolated from those things in your system that cause noise/jitter.
Built-in vs. Standalone DACs
The general consensus here seems to be that standalone DACs are generally better than those built into an integrated amplifier. Many also agree that standalone DACs provide more flexibility, i.e., you can swap DACs without changing the amp.
For the sake of discussion, let’s set aside the flexibility argument and only focus on sound fidelity for now. The primary advantage of a standalone DAC is that it provides better isolation (reduction in electrical noise) since it’s not sharing its architecture with other shared components like power supplies and chassis, etc. I’m also assuming that service and repair is a bit easier as well. What other technical advantages can you guys think of?
Another salient point that I’ve come across is that many manufacturers treat a built-in DAC as an afterthought, and so while the DACs might not be bad per se they are never the star of the show. As a result, the manufacturers don’t go the extra mile in a way that a company producing standalone DACs might. I think you can put Krell, Hegel, McIntosh in this bucket. If you disagree, feel free to correct me.
But on the other hand, we see some high-end manufacturers providing built-in DAC modules and charging quite a bit for it. Examples include Accuphase, Gryphon, Aavik, Soluution, Audio Research, etc. In many cases, the addition of a DAC module can set you back an additional $5-7k. Do you guys think the high cost is basically a ’convenience’ surcharge, or can these high-end built-in DACs compete with DACs that cost about the same, e.g. standalone DACs in the $5-10K range.
So let’s say someone is ordering a Gryphon Diablo 300 and have to decide between adding their DAC module, or buying a separate DAC. Ignoring the flexibility argument for a minute, which route provides better SQ?
- ...
- 44 posts total
Honestly I wonder about the separates argument in the highest price tiers. If I bought a streamer/DAC combo, or integrated amp/DAC, in the $20K range, I would expect the DAC to be damn good, and not an afterthought. Separates might make more sense in the $5K range, where a standalone DAC is likely to significantly best one included with another component |
@mahler123 That’s exactly what I wonder about as well. I recently talked to a couple of designers of higher-end ($20K+) audio equipment and my understanding is that they put in significant R&D efforts to avoid the usual pitfalls of integrated DACs at lower price points. They also mentioned that having a shorter signal path and less buffering along the way often results in better results. At least one of the designers is confident that his built-in DACs are as good as separates at around the same price point. For example, if he charges an extra $6k for a DAC module, he is quite certain that this DAC will sound just as good as a separate DAC unit at the same price point. Obviously, a separate DAC which is more expensive, say > $10K, will sound better. |
And then there is the advantage of less boxes and cables. This is a reprise of the integrated amp vs separate pre and power amp issue. When the high end companies such as ARC started making really good integrated amps that sounded basically indistinguishable from separates by the same manufacturer, the theoretical arguments for separates were more justifiable at a lower price point |
“Ignoring the flexibility argument for a minute, which route provides better SQ?” I often hear folks saying integrated got me close to 85-90% performance of separates. For many that’s good enough considering the entry price for separates, cabling and added complexities. I believe you know the path too well, separates for ultimate performance and flexibility or a great performing Integrated with fewer compromises. Those seeking that top tier 5-10% performance will always find themselves going the separates route. The laws of diminishing returns in this arena does not apply as you’re in that rarified air of pursuing and extracting every last ounce of performance from your gear. |
- 44 posts total