Are audiophile products designed to initially impress then fatigue to make you upgrade?


If not why are many hardly using the systems they assembled, why are so many upgrading fairly new gear that’s fully working? Seems to me many are designed to impress reviewers, show-goers, short-term listeners, and on the sales floor but once in a home system, in the long run, they fatigue users fail to engage and make you feel something is missing so back you go with piles of cash.

128x128johnk

 No, not if you bought the right components in the first place. By right, I mean don't buy overly analytical or bright equipment.

Planned obsolescence does exist in mass produced gear like Denon/Pioneer/Yamaha AVR gear.

I disagree with the premise that better quality manufacturers design goals are to lure you in, then some magic switch goes off to produce sound that is intentionally  fatiguing.

But it's a great idea that I'm sure the low-end sales guys would love.

 

Yup, it's a bloody conspiracy, for sure. It's amazing that you figured it out. Congrats!

What do you plan to do next?