Are audiophile products designed to initially impress then fatigue to make you upgrade?


If not why are many hardly using the systems they assembled, why are so many upgrading fairly new gear that’s fully working? Seems to me many are designed to impress reviewers, show-goers, short-term listeners, and on the sales floor but once in a home system, in the long run, they fatigue users fail to engage and make you feel something is missing so back you go with piles of cash.

128x128johnk

Not true look at very high end dacs like the chord Dave 

It’s  very detailed and cutting edge but very neutral ,which for instance if you have a Vacuum tube amplifier or preamp would be a ideal match , also with the hundreds of brand Audio cables ,even digital they all have a solid signature that you personally can Taylor to your specific Audio system ,it just takes time and monies to 

match, sometimes you have to sell something to get better synergy ,but that’s what Audiophiles do. Some Audio dealers allow a trial period . You control your $$ .

you absolutely should research every product and reviews,forum information you are considering to purchase.

 No, not if you bought the right components in the first place. By right, I mean don't buy overly analytical or bright equipment.

Planned obsolescence does exist in mass produced gear like Denon/Pioneer/Yamaha AVR gear.

I disagree with the premise that better quality manufacturers design goals are to lure you in, then some magic switch goes off to produce sound that is intentionally  fatiguing.

But it's a great idea that I'm sure the low-end sales guys would love.