The 300B World


Disclosure:  I am not new to Aric Audio, but I am new to the 300B.

 

I took delivery of my Aric Audio 300B PSET a couple of months ago. Since then, every listening hour has been different than it would have been were I new to both. I want to know who is responsible for what I'm hearing. So, the overriding question every observation is passed through is simply "Was that the 300B or was that the 'Aric Audio Heft'?" Over the years I have purchased a number of different amps and preamps from Aric and have come to identify certain characteristics that can be expected from all of his builds. That's why I keep going back. Examples include the "dead black" background, the solid signal strength delivered by his preamps, the ease with which the soundstage can be mapped, and the raw power resulting from the overbuilt approach he takes in his design work: "The Aric Audio Heft." Knowing what I would get from any Aric Audio amp is instrumental in being able to appreciate the magic of the "show off tube." 

 

I've heard it said that people who go to the 300B never really come back and I've been intrigued by that ever since. It invites critical listening across the broadest spectrum of music one can tolerate. It's here that observations are bagged and tagged, the first being the kind of music I listen to matters much less because I find myself listening differently and hearing so much more. One of my favorites is the leading edge of the lower frequencies and the way every beat reminds me that I'm listening to a 300B. The way I would characterize the sound profile would be to say it's as if the veil has finally been lifted and the distance between the performance and my listening chair closed. You know it immediately even if you can't quite define it yet and it commands your attention.

 

For some reason I'm surprised by how closely the tonal qualities of SET and PSET modes align. Somehow, I thought there would be more of a "sonic cost" for that extra power. I'm still cautious here though because the quad of tubes I'm using for PSET mode are not topflight tubes. So, the final analysis will have to wait until I can level the playing field. In SET mode I'm listening to a pair of Gold Lions, which I consider to be at least among the heavyweights. The question I'm presently grappling with is which tubes come next? I've done my due diligence researching the various offerings and think it will be a quad of Emission Labs XLS 300Bs. Any input around your experience with 300B tubes I would welcome. Yes, I have my wish list that starts with the Western Electrics (which I'm sure I'll own one day) but the guidance I'm seeking here is the step between now and then. What would be a suitable tube to take an already remarkable experience to a whole new level? Conversely, are there tubes that I should simply stay away from? My thanks to all. Happy listening.

128x128pseudonym

I find that there are differences in the sound of 300b, 2a3 and 45 tubes based on hearing many different amps employing these tubes. 

@larryi 

I think you'll find that the differences you hear have more to do with who designed and built the output transformers than anything else. How well the tube works with the transformer; how well the driver circuit and voltage amplifier circuits work all affect the sound. So it seems unlikely that anyone might be able to describe the sound of the different tubes given those variables!

A large difference in the power output of those SET tubes 45 about 1.5 watts, 2a3 about 2-3 watts, 300b about 8 watts. This you will hear if running high eff loudspeakers but transformers and overall design matter much in SET.  I tend to use 300b but have owned almost all types.

@larryi 

All three can sound great and can sort of flip this generalization, depending on the specific implementation.  The 300b does offer a bit more power

The way I view it as well. I have heard all three of these sound tremendously good if implemented correctly. Same with the 211 and 845. All of them are very capable tubes in the right talented hands. It just so happens that for my needs the 300b is sublime. I have high regard for all of these tubes. 
 

Depending on the speaker in use, I could be thrilled with anyone of these tubes in an amplifier.

Charles

It might well be the case that it is the difference in transformers, or other design factors, that determine the sound and that the tubes themselves have no particular sound.  But, whatever the case, I do think their are rough tendencies that distinguish 300b amps from 2a3 and 45 amps--and it is not just power output.  If it were power, it would be hard to explain why I like the 45 tube (and it is not just me).  But, all three are capable of delivering good sound and I like both pushpull and SET amps utilizing these tubes.  As charles1dad mentioned, there are also 211 and 845 amps that sound good too.  

@larryi

It might well be the case that it is the difference in transformers, or other design factors, that determine the sound and that the tubes themselves have no particular sound. But, whatever the case, I do think their are rough tendencies that distinguish 300b amps from 2a3 and 45 amps--and it is not just power output

Not only do tubes have their unique intrinsic sonic signature, you can further delineate by brand/manufacturer. A Western Electric/Elrog/EML/Takasuki 300b all sound a bit different from one another I’ve heard all 4 of them in my amplifier. Then one can achieve further distinctions dependent upon choice accompanied wire/capacitor/transformer/resistors etc. Everything has an influence on the sound.

This is why One could have six different 300b amplifiers and they do not sound identical at all (Substitute any other tube of choice). For example, someone such as Thomas Mayer can (Does) offer several variations of an amplifier using the exact same tube. Each version will have its individual sonic signature. Again, exactly the same output tube.

Audio equipment /components/parts and and how humans hear and interpret them is fascinating.

Charles