@gladmo
Thanks for that. Those were my 2 points when at my low point in hi-end audio.
Currently. . . . how to describe? I like a system which lets me connect to the emotional and musical content of the song. Auditioning, I put in a song and don’t really listen for anything. It plays tunes, nothing stands out, and I don’t think about the system. The 2 things I aim for are:
1) Top to bottom even.
- Flat frequency response.
- The more full range the better. No sound below 70Hz is not "even".
- No integration problems between drivers.
- Meaning well designed crossover (better yet none)
- No change in sound quality between drivers.
- Potential problems like: Metal tweeter and poly woofer / Ribbon tweeter vs. cone midrange.
- No change in tone going from low volumes to high volumes.
- Harmonically correct. This again relates to even sound with higher level harmonic in balance with the fundamental. Resulting in instruments and vocals sound like themselves.
2) Immediacy - means the music’s is "there" and you can feel what the musicians are trying to convey. What they are thinking when they play. Achieved by, IMHO- minimal crossover components, clean power, not trying to fix one problem component with another, and minimal system components in general. This encompasses:
- Transparency.
- Clarity.
- PRAT.
- Soundstaging.
- Dynamics / lack of compression.
- Black background.
It’s all about choosing where to compromise and no system can do it all. The more differences between songs the better. Also better spatially means the system is dong something more right.
Looking at this list, I come up with something like Quads or single driver speaker run with a chip amp or SET? Maybe horn speakers or omni like MBL / Ohm / 3D mutli speakwr systems.