Exactly. I believed something "told" once. Thought I’d put it to the test myself. It was about a really great measuring DAC on said forum. All looked good on measurements and graphs. I took the plunge, went out and bought it with intent it would be a long term keeper DAC. Played it for just under two weeks. Unfortunately, ended up sending it back for a full refund and kept a different unit that measured worse.
Sad as if you had spent a modicum of effort performing a blind test, you would have arrived at a very different conclusion. But no, you wanted to involve your eyes and ignore elasticity of your brain and its poor recall memory.
Reminds me of someone who sent me a Schiit Yggdrasil $2,500 DAC. He told me it sounded much better than a well measuring Topping DAC. I asked him how he tested. He gave me his tracks and said he used Stax headphones which I also had.
I went to setup an AB test and it was clear that levels were not matched between the two. I matched them and then performed a blind test. With normal volume, there was no difference whatsoever between the Topping and Schiit Yggdrasil. Again I replicated his entire setup. And this was the conclusion.
The problem continues to be that people believe in random testing of the gear where many factors are involved beyond the fidelity of the two products. And then complain when their observations don't match science and engineering. Well, you can't mix non-science and science.
So tell your stories but not to me please. Come back when you can at least be bothered to do an AB test without your eyes involved.