How Has Your Finely Tuned Audiophile Dexterity Helped You in Your "Other" Life?


Listening. Observing. Trying. Failing. Perceiving the nuances. And, sledge hammer impacts. Developing a new vocubulary. (As well as using very familiar terms when things don’t go as expected), Sorting through tons of data. Skillfully differentiating between the things that matter, and things that don’t. To us, anyway.

So, how have these skills (and, being a generally good person) helped you in life? Or, others?

Here’s one to start:

Wine Pouring:

My wife and I like to drink wine. Landing a enjoyable wine in the single digits (after all discounts applied) is a big win for us. Our evening of wine allocation and enjoyment generally takes on the following cadence: Pour One. Pour two (making sure to save just a little in the bottle). Then, the highly anticipated "desperation pour". The last 2 sips for each poured from the bottle. This way we take a pause, and take the time to fully appreciate those last two sips. Silly, but it’s what we do.

Frankly, I’ve gotten pretty good at this wine allocation thing. Equal pours, every time. For a while there, I thought I was just "lucky" and timed it just right. But, recently, I’ve concluded it’s something more. My "finely tuned audiophile" dexterity.

As we have all observed, when you fill a vessel with liquid, the frequency of the sound changes as the space in the vessel becomes occupied with more liquid. I was unaware that I was paying attention to those frequencies and my brain remembered the frequency at the conclusion of the last pour. So, when filling the second glass, I just listened and stopped when the frequency of the last pour was matched. Seems to work for me (within a tolerance of a few Hz/Mls). This doens’t help when you’re camping in near darkness and miss the glass completely, but has worked for us in a workable domestic sense for quite some time. Now I thank Sal Marantz, Frank McIntosh, and others after those (nearly) perfect pours.

128x128waytoomuchstuff

Hasn't helped one bit.

No audio club where I live.

All of my family and normal friends think it's weird.

My four music buff friends get it, but only one is willing to spend serious coin and effort with setup to "get there".

My wife has to remind me most people just don't care how good or bad music sounds, it's just background noise.

I've learned the hard way unless a guest requests to listen to my system (almost never) they will not get excited about how it sounds.

I have exactly one friend like me who is willing to cut expenses in other areas in order to have the best gear he can afford.

I'm envious of people who live in a city large enough to have an audio club, and access to audio shows.

As much as I love this since hobby (since age 15) I can't fathom why more people don't embrace it like I do.

 

Most people dont care about art, nor astronomy nor poetry neither about number theory or mammals morphology or linguistic astounding revelations...

Most people love when they recognize the melody corporations sell them , now making it as a sound enginering pop-up merchandize industry...

Most people dont care about history, geopolitics or medecine true art, they sleepwalk to death with pods in the ears ... Sorry ...

They dont give a damn about acoustics when listening music nor about some senile warmonger pushing the nuclear button ...

i am not optimist this month ... 🤐

Now i dont think you are weird...You had a passion and curiosity...

No audio club where I live.

All of my family and normal friends think it's weird.

 

Regrettably it hasn’t helped me at all.  Sometimes I try to communicate my love of well reproduced music and I can measure the amount of time for the listeners eyes to glaze over with a stopwatch.  Occasionally someone will listen tome and then start enthusing about the soundbar they purchased from Best Buy, which they probably haven’t listened to in years, and it is an effort for me not to pull the audio snob face and really be a major bore.  I’ve learned not to discuss it at all.

Having the skills you mention helped me develop an audiophile system.

I got those skills from learning to play the guitar and from reading and writing.

Understanding a bit better psycho-acoustics problems and acoustic one was very deep philosophically in meaning.. it help me to think ...

i am not gifted musically , i was thrown out of choral when i was young because of my unability to perceive tonal correctness and reproduce it ...

i now think that it is because sound for me are more a set of continuous visual meaningful abstractions than separate sounds ...I visualize symphonies for example as the Bruckner 5 th for example as an entire story , an abstract movie full of meanings , i can translate in words as a story to some degree ...

( in the 5th symphony the composer reproduce a near death experience when all his life events are recorded and lived anew but with a new meaning till the final chord of the last long fugue in the last movement , reproducing in the same order the life events lived through as emotions in the first movements.... it is for this reason for me the greatest deeper symphony ever written after the 7th of Beethoven who describe the grounded movement of any natural life seeds or animals and how by his creative potential any life break even the hardest resistance to grow in an irresistible liberating movement the symphony describe in the allegretto; for sure, there is more beautiful symphonies as the ninth of Bruckner or the sixth of Beethoven but no deeper one for me , the most tragic symphony is the Schumann 4th by Furtwangler describing exactly his mental disease , one of the deepest symphony too i ever heard especially directed by a maestro who was able to understand his meaning... Almost no other maestro could because they think that this symphony is a mere piece of music instead of a cry desesperate for help and reproducing his mental state oscillations between abyss despair and rare ectasy )... ...

Then i am deaf to separate tones even if i perceive them distinctly it is always perceived by associative differentiation not isolated ...music has no colors for me though as for each tone experience in some synesthesia ... Instead music for me is dynamical forms i see in space ...It is the reason i was in ectasy with Bach at 13 years old ... It is the more geometrically balanced composer ...At the age when others listened to the beatles i was in Bach because of that "handicap" ...

The philosophical aspects of my last decade investigation in music and acoustic had a deep impact in my worldview... Instead of thinking about music to be as said Leibnitz very astutely :

"Music is the pleasure the human mind experiences from counting without being aware that it is counting" - Gottfried Leibniz

I was sure of that all my life ...

But i changed my mind after my acoustic journey, now i know for sure that it is mathematics which is musical, a silent music , in his core not the reverse ....

Mathematic as music must be perceived and is perceived as music is in TIME RYTHMS....The great mathematician Alain Connes think so ... And my last thinker discovery think exactly that : anirban

https://twitter.com/anirbanbandyo?lang=en

The Rhythm of The Primes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8x374slJGuo