Full range with subs. Or at least 3 way monitors. IMHO.
full range or mini's and a sub
Guys I'm not the most seasoned audiophile so I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. However, here it goes... I have heard many audiophiles talk about the magic of mini-monitors and their ability to disappear and soundstage. Many say that it is very difficult to get the same advantages with full-range speakers. Still most reference systems seem to be built around full range speakers. If there is a true magic to mini-monitors why don't I see more reference systems with mini-monitors and subs for the lows?
- ...
- 17 posts total
OP,
You ask a great question. +1 to @erik_squires. The answer is a huge it depends. It will depend on the room and a lot about your budget and values in sound. Either can disappear. There are so many important aspects to the sound of a system, all of which are trade offs. Also, how much experience you have at putting together a system comes in. Integrating a sub with mini monitors can be intimidating… but if well done effective. First we need to know more about your room like Erik asks.
|
If you plan on speakers where you think you might add a sub, now or future: make it Plural, plan on two subs, plan space so they can be forward facing adjacent to the main speakers, I say no port for the mains or subs, but if port, forward facing. Low bass may start Mono, but the overtones become directional. 40/80/160/320/ ....There is a lot to be said for Stereo Bass. I listen to a pair of 15" woofers (1/side), the imaging of bass players is important and enjoyable.. |
- 17 posts total