A.I. music
Possibly of interest: "the current rush to advance generative AI technology could be "spiritually, politically, and economically" corrosive. By effectively removing people, like musicians, from algorithms and tech that create new content, elements of society that were once connections between people are turned into "objects" that become less interesting and meaningful, Lanier explained.
"As soon as you have the algorithms taking music from musicians, mashing it up into new music, and then not paying the musicians, gradually you start to undermine the economy because what happens to musicians now happens to everybody later," Lanier said.
He noted that, while this year has been the "year of AI," next year the world is going to be "flooded, flooded with AI-generated music."
https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-jaron-lanier-ai-advancing-without-human-dignity-undermines-everything-2023-10
So true... Thanks for your post... I like Rick Beato ...
|
I think that between Bernard Mandeville corrupted but creative and rich hive society as a model of capitalism using A.I. as tool and the Amish refusal there is a middle way determined by the rethinking of the social fabric hierarchies value ... This exclude unelected Bill Gates or Google takes over of societies priority... I cannot say more here ... 😊
Music is meanings, not abstracted meaning only but concrete recognized meaning born from the human body metabolism and soul history... A.I. music will be a corruption of music sold as entertainment ... Some musicians composers will used it... I will stick to the acoustically rooted musician playing a historically meaningful instrument... I prefer didgeridoo anyway to electronica... 😁 |
Led Zeppelin will definitely benefit from this mix... Bach will not benefit at all ...😊 Imagine Led Zeppelin is a beautiful woman and Bach a male genius she want him as husband to procreate together :
«Reportedly there was famous exchange between the prominent playwright George Bernard Shaw and the glamorous dancer Isadora Duncan on the topic of producing a child together. Duncan stated that Shaw had a magnificent brain and she had a glorious beauty; the combination would yield a remarkable child. Shaw replied with regret that he feared the result would embody his beauty and her brains.»
|
