The real truth about recordings


I was trying to post a link to a good article but was blocked. New rules?

It's from Stereophile, called: 

On Assessing Sonic Illusions
Jim Austin  |  Mar 12, 2024

mashif

I use VPN and I was blocked this morning. Pausing the VPN allowed me to post.

Interesting article.  I honestly don’t care how a recording is made, only that it sounds natural and good.  Like they said in the article, it’s all about how the pieces are artfully put together.

@soix 

That's how I feel about sausage. I just want it to taste good. But tasty sounding recordings are something I want to know more about. 

As I have always said, there are no great "songs," there are only (1) great performances and (2) great recordings. In hi-fi we deal with recordings.
(Actually there a few songs so good that almost nobody could mess them up. Except maybe James Taylor. Taylor could probably eviscerate anything just by thinking about it, the same way Trump declassifies national security documents). 

Understood and agreed - but maybe it goes without saying. You can compare two television sets - one being better looking than the other - without getting into a discussion about editing. It is a necessary evil. The problem pops up when you try and define ‘better’ by saying ‘closer to the truth’. Understanding that truth is not obtainable can be either disappointing or can free you to peruse quality within the boundaries that it is feasible. 

ESP disks have the tag line ‘Artists alone will decide what you hear on their ESP disk’. Sounds good in principle - but anybody who has ventured deeply into their catalog with an open mind would find themselves secretly wishing they had a well trained engineer or producer steering the ship on some tracks. Raw truth, as much as we may say we want to hold up in the air as a paradigm of perfection, isn’t really what we want.