Quick question for the Cables Don't Make a Difference Crowd.

The cable unbelievers either don't have audiophile ears or an unresolving system where wires are just wires.  My 1975 Kenwood receiver sounded great with anything!  Until my upgrade journey began....You know how it goes.  Cable quality should be similar to equipment quality.

Clearly it's under your skin or you wouldn't have chosen to start an entire thread that is basically trolling.  What you just did was try to start a fight with literally no functional need for your posts.  I think I saw you on the highway tailgating 2 feet from the car in front of you yesterday, weaving in and out without signaling. Your post is basically road rage in another form. 

Cables do sound different...a little.  But for HiFi stores' profit margin...a lot!  This is the legacy of the Head Monster, super salesman Noel Lee.  IME, compared to room acoustics and proper speaker placement, they matter little.  High value brands like WBC or BJC are good enough for all but the real esoteric "everything matters" crowd, with pocket depth to match.  Look inside classics like a Marantz or ARC tube component...no teflon insulated linear crystal unobtanium wire, oversized capacitors, etc.  Best sounding classical records ever made?  Living Stereo. Decca. Living Presence...alll made without exotic mic cables or parts.

That's an excellent suggestion, to bad the millions of others who thought of it didn't do it? Perhaps it was because something still had to be plugged in which would require a special very expensive power cord to connect to standard inferior house wiring? Also the manufacturers of all equipment use the required quality wire for their product, I can buy a $2000 6 foot cable to go from the amp to the speaker and then it into an extremely poor quality wire according to the cable gods for the last 4 feet of wire inside the speaker, does not make any sense at all? 

My system sounds great as is so why would I want to spend more money to prove what I already know?