I would think that higher sensitivity, more forward sounding speakers may suit you better.
Although the Totems are not exactly low sensitivity, there may be better options, I would also look at the charts at https://www.spinorama.org/
Nearfield Low-Level Listening : New Speakers or EQ? Thoughts?
In my main rig, I listen nearfield at low levels, and I do not feel the music sounds fully engaging until moderate-to-loud volumes. Have been told my speakers, Totem Forest Signature, "need power to sing". I have ordered a Schiit Loki Max EQ; wondering if that will do the trick or do I need to consider new speakers? I use the Loudness/Comp feature on my integrated amp, it helps some. Listen to 70s, Jazz, Americana, ...
My System:
I would think that higher sensitivity, more forward sounding speakers may suit you better. Although the Totems are not exactly low sensitivity, there may be better options, I would also look at the charts at https://www.spinorama.org/ |
Woofer: 6.5″ / 16.51 cm, 3″ / 7.62 cm voice coil. I assume standmounts have the same woofer.
Agreed. And I agree that you would need an amp that has full output at the first watt. But that will not fix your problem. I agree and disagree on EQ / Fletcher Munson. Yes, you can brute force correct for low volumes with eq. But "FR compensation" and "Come to life" are two different things. Yes, Aiwa stuff was great. Giant Sony had an interesting way to deal with their competition. They bought Aiwa and then "discontinued" the company.
|
EQ will render a more cost-effective solution for you. The reason is that even a V-shaped SPL speaker will, in most cases I’ve seen, provide a boost of around 5 dB in the mid-bass and upper registers. However, to achieve the equal loudness contour (ELC), you typically need a 9-10 dB boost in the bass region for an average listening level of 45-55 dB, as I have at night. Additionally, I believe digital EQ is more effective than its analog counterpart. |
New speakers see here Mike |