What does 90% of the Absolute Best Sound Cost?


Like many things, I have come to believe that the cost of incremental improvements in audio come at exponentially increasing costs - e.g., big improvement from $5K to $10K, less so from $10 to $15K, etc. All of us have our limits regarding what we can/will spend to achieve our best possible/practical audio experience. So, a couple of questions that I am sure are at least somewhat subjective.

A. What does it cost, in terms of components, interconnects, and direct furnishings (e.g., racks, isolation pads, surface room treatments, etc.) to achieve 90% of the absolute best sound possible?

B. What % does $50,000 get you?

FWIW, my setup is at about $21,000 actual cost ($32,000 original retail) and I am really happy with it right now. All of my incremental spend for the next couple of years is going to be working the room itself. Looking forward to your perspectives!

128x128mattsca

We're talking about best sound possible from 2 channel audio, which in my opinion is able to sound very good, but is fundamentally limited by the format. 

From my perspective, and from my limited experience I'd say a carefully selected equipment setup could get you 90 percent of that potential for about five thousand dollars. This is assuming you want accurate, uncolored sound that doesn't extend too deep in into the infra-bass, and isn't trying to fill a large room with very high sound levels. 

If you want boutique sound, I have no answer. It totally depends on what sort of effect you're looking for. 

I'd say $50,000 should be able to get you direct sound from the speakers and electronics that is indistinguishable from perfect, in terms of accuracy, to the human ear (for that format.) 

The catch is I said direct sound. Excellent $50,000 systems with very wisely chosen components can all sound different. That's because perfect hasn't been defined yet in terms of dispersion and the resulting indirect room reflections. So people may still have their preferences between these systems as played in various rooms. And some people may be perfectly justified in their preference of a $2000 system over a $50,000 system because they like the directivity of the $2000 system's speakers more. 

A lot of people spend $50K on a system that sounds like crap. but they have all the names mentioned in stereophile. And some fine looking crap. If you’re only looking at sound, not name or looks, I could put together a 90+% system for $10K.

@mapman The room is 90% of the deal. I've proven it to myself many times over. No matter what I spend in my living room it will never sound like my loft. A more modest system but definitely sounds better.

I’m thinking it would be around $70k or so... $50K used. I would guess my system is at 95% and is about $150K... I’d have to double the cost to get to 98%. I just helped a friend get a system a step down... maybe 90%... it’s very subjective, obviously. $10K streamer, $10K DAC, $12K preamp, $12K amp, and $22K speakers.

I guess it's all relative.

I am pretty sure that if I had 50k to start a new system with I could reproduce a sound that would blow me away.

But members talk about speakers that cost 50k all by themselves and I cannot even begin to imagine how good those must sound.

So, as I typed, I guess it's all relative.