@panzrwagn +3. If I were to frame my posts like you do yours, I'd never have them taken down. 😄👍
All the best,
Nonoise
Chinese DAC's
I have been looking at several DAC's trying to decide which one to put in my system. Some of those DAC's I'm looking at are built and designed in China. Without getting political I don't think trade with China will ever be the same. I hope that these engineers are able to get there products to market. It would sure be a waste of talent.
@panzrwagn +3. If I were to frame my posts like you do yours, I'd never have them taken down. 😄👍 All the best, |
i am very happy with my Douk Chinese tube pre-amp equalizer at a peanuts cost with 7 tones control... I am very happy with my Hidiz AP 80 pro dac+equalizer+ music files bank at a peanuts cost right now... I am very happy with my battery headphone amp Fosi for my second pair of headphone (movies documentary) at peanuts cost... I own powered Edifier low cost speakers also a Chinese product... My room acoustics and headphone modification and synergy make my system at low cost totally satisfying for my needs... I am very picky about sound quality, the reason why i concentrate on acoustics for years of experiment... China is not another planet, only a "new" player which had 5,000 years of history and engineering... My music listening is primary my optimized headphone AKG K340, German top design of the golden era, and incidentaly modified speakers in near field with acoustics room controls (Helmholtz resonators Schuman generators etc)... Acoustics rules.
|
@vinylvalet @fthompson251 @nonoise Thank you. My realization of global supply chains began with a 1984 VW Jetta, engine and transmission made in Germany, tires from Brazil, Glass from the US, stereo from Japan, wheels from Italy and body built and assembled in Mexico. I made a bumper sticker for it that said, 'Made on Earth / By Humans'. Nothing much has happened in the last 40 years to change that view, except the rise in Intellectual Property as a factor in value resulting in the concept of value chains, where the metric changes from material value to intellectual value added. Audio provides any number of perfect examples of that. Anybody with a table saw and a Parts Express catalog (no offense, I actually like them) can get into the speaker business. But not just anybody can build a KEF, or a Sonus Faber, or a Wilson. Anybody can buy ESS Sabre DAC chips, case and power supply, but executing the software for the filters is a whole 'nother level of value add. Building big flat panel TVs, which the US has zero manufacturing capacity, would require licensing a ton of IP (if it were even offered) on the process of making zero-defect screens. So worse than the obsolete concept of material tariffs, the ignorance of the equally or more important value chains make these trade restrictions poorly conceived and a failure before they even begin. We gave away manufacturing decades ago, and it's not coming back, except perhaps as automated factories. We are world leaders in lots of IP areas, in medicine, biotechnology, and computers (where is nVidias real value? Their IP portfolio). Failing to invest in and protect that will truly be the loss of our last, best chance. |
@freediver "It is a COMMON PROPAGANDIST PLOY to hide political statements with platitudes..The very statements "I don't think trade with China will ever be the same. I hope that these engineers are able to get there products to market."are subtle but definite references to political based policies!"
|
@mahgister : " "Wise post! And then......? |