A few years ago the local Yamaha piano dealer rented our local concert hall, The Kravits Center, in West Palm Beach, for an entire weekend to promote pianos. A concert pianist was hired to demonstrate and compare the entire range of instruments from the mighty C9 on down. The most impressive range to me were the upper end of the Clavinova range. These are electronic instruments voiced to clone the sound of Yamaha C7 and C9 Concert Grands. The keyboards are dimensioned and weighted to mimic the full sized instruments as well. Some very accomplished pianists tried them and verified the claim. I have perfect pitch and in terms of tonality and dynamics at least in the hall going from one to the other, the sound was indistinguishable. That was on day one. By day 3, the C7 was going ever so slightly out of tune which gave it away in favor of the Clavinova. The C9 held firm.
Why not the piano as a reference for bass
I see a lot of commentary/reviews on a systems bass response that all seem to hinge on the 41 hz double bass and such range. At 27.5 the A0 note on a piano seems a better point to judge. Lots of piano in normal music vs say an organ note. I know when I feel that deep chord played it is one of things I enjoy about listening the most! Was listening to Wish you were here live and the piano was sublime.
So is it more of how much musical energy is perceived in the 40 hz range or what that makes this more of a reproduction benchmark?
I welcome your input!
New Joe Bonamassa out BTW!
- ...
- 86 posts total
- 86 posts total