audioquest vs acoustic zen/kimber digital cable

This crazy guy never got the chance to use the MC2. Did thi crazy guy use the Nite? This crazy guy is too crazy to remember. However, crazy guy remembers he much prefers Cardas Golden Cross over Lightning. And, he remembers Siltech2 is not much far behind the GC. Furthermore, he remembers Bogdan IC is lots better than Siltech2. Lastly, he remembers magnetwire is better than Bogdan. (All used in digital application but in ever changing environment.)

But, yah, 75ohm cables suck. Agree with Dean. Personally, me thinks 75ohm is marketing hype. What does 75ohm mean anyways relatively to 110ohm? Higher resistance? Wish someone can make digital interconnects out of Firewire. This crazy guy back to sleep...

I agree I used to own the D60 and sold it after getting the MC2, the D60 had dull flat sound compared to the MC2. I also tried the Nite and didn't feel like it was worth the asking price over the MC2. I did slightly prefer it, just not at 3x the price

Guys thanks for the comparisons between the pricier cables but could anyone comment on the difference btwn the az/kimber and the audioquest dig 2 as Im really curious how big a difference you guys think may exist in the setup described above (ie worth springing the cash for it) thanks again

Actually the Acoustic Zen MC2 isn't a pricey cable, you should be able to snag a one meter fellow for about $160. Sorry, I don't have any experience with the AQ digital cable.

AQ d2 is what i had before a 500.00 Wireworld digital which was an improvement.
I then tried an AZ mc=2 and could not believe how much difference a digital cable could make.
Soundstaging and a detailed yet sweet sound are the mc-2 signature.

Get the AZ, even at list it is a bargain imho