The use of the word "musical" as an adjective


For years I've read reviews and many comments from audiophiles describing this, that, or the other component as "musical."   I never understood the term used that way, especially given the endless variables involved when it comes to how human beings perceive music, whether reproduced or "live."

Can anyone define precisely WTF "musical" means in any meaningful way?  

I didn't think so.   :)

Have at it, folks.
ps
I hear it as something that has pleasing harmonious qualities, sufficient enough to have me suspend belief in that I'm hearing a mechanical representation of the event. 👍

Next.
+1 @nonoise 

For me, "musical" as an adjective = nothing between me and the music.  A lot of the buzzwords that have been tossed around are far less clear to me.  For example, "warm" or "clinical."  While I do understand the impression that people are trying to convey, those words mean less to me when describing music reproduction than "musical."

Of course, the audiophile media has a vested interest in obtuse approaches as it sustains their livelihood.  Nothing inherently wrong with that unless terms like "impactful" start getting tossed around, but I don't want to get started on how the (mis)use of English has been degraded.  I miss Frank Zappa!
 Emotions preserved in the music and toes are tapping.... that's "musical" to me, vs a mechanical reproduction.
Well given the responses posted here I'd say that people have a pretty clear understanding of the term "musical". When I use this term it is meant as a compliment.  It implies music reproduction that breathes life and emotion and allows engagement and a joyful spontaneous interaction. Toe tapping as 1markr wrote. I believe people know it when they hear it. 😊

Non musical presentation would on the other hand be sterile, mechanical,  dry and lacking emotional involvement.  Some would say that the music sounds "canned" or a processed. This is not a compliment. 
Charles