Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
I currently have a borrowed First Watt S.I.T push pull version by Mr. Pass himself for the D,I,Y, community which he loves. Pure class A and 40 watts, this is quite a good sounding amplifier with exceptional tone/timbre. Yet in direct comparison with the Frankenstein the SET has more purity and tonal authenticity in my opinion. The presentation is also more emotionally engaging with the SET. Snopro noted the same in his 2 amplifier  comparison. I guess we both hear in a similar fashion.
Charles
So, I spoke with Eric at Tekton, and he says that the mini-Ulfs are about 7 days out, 10 days at the max. 

This is a good things being that my loaner speakers sold, and I also sold some radials that I had. 

I'm speakerless! 
David,

You have inquired about a very personal and subjective aspect of reproduction of music for the playback in our home.

It's going to be difficult for me to add anymore than what Charles has already said but I will try.

When I judge a system for my personal interpretation of what sounds the best,most natural with reference to real instruments and voices,and also Important to me is correct Image size,I listen for the following criteria in this order.

Tone 
Timbre
Texture
Overall soundstage presentation which would include Liquidity or holographics.

If my system pleases my ears in these aspects,especially the first 3 then I concentrate all my attention to the stage and judge critically to what I interpret to be believeable for a recording.

Basically If I listen to any system and the tone is to bright or to dark for me I stop right there and make changes to my system.

I'm not so critical with Timbre and Texture and generally speaking of the high level of gear represented on this thread It ends up being a hair splitting contest.If these aspects of the overall sonics sound correct and pleasing to the individual listener then I say go with what you like.

Now with all that being said,
I will bring up the absolute most important aspect for me and that would be the engagement or emotional connection with the music that I'm getting and feeling.When this connection is high I forget all about the rest of these aspects and get lost in the music and I probably couldn't even tell you if the Di speaker has 7 tweeters or 40.😃

Always remember every form of music is all about Emotion,I'm sure you know this.

I probably will always have some different gear around that at a moments notice I can change and get a slightly different flavor,fun stuff.

Here is a couple links that may help,

https://www.stereophile.com/reference/50/

https://www.musical-u.com/learn/music-timbre-texture-tone/

I hope any of this has helped,

Kenny.


evolvist,

I would say you have some good news and at the same time you have also some bad news.

I sure hope you get those minis in a timely manner and that you enjoy some really good music played from them.

Kenny.
One question about the Freya someone mentioned earlier. Did you want a replacement for additional features or because of some sonic shortcomings? Thanks